Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-lqqdg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-07T21:18:58.105Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Relationship Between Microstructure and Efficiency of Scintillating Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

M. Bliss ,
R. A. Craig ,
P. L. Reeder ,
D. S. Sunberg  and
M. J. Weber
M. Bliss
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
R. A. Craig
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
P. L. Reeder
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
D. S. Sunberg
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Box 999, Richland, WA 99352
M. J. Weber
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA 94551
Get access

Abstract

Prior work has shown that there is a correlation between trap densities and scintillation efficiency of cerium-activated, lithium-aluminosilicate glasses. Raman spectroscopy has strongly suggested that phase separation may be playing an important role in governing the scintillation efficiency. In this study, we relate the thermoluminescence glow-curve data and microstructural analysis for a compositional series. The thermoluminescence data provide information about the traps in the neighborhood of the activator (Ce3+). The microscopy and crystallization of the glasses provide direct evidence of activator partitioning.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 348 , 1994 , 195
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Ginther, R. J., IRE Trans. Nucl. Sci. NS-5, 92 (1958).Google Scholar
2. Brawer, S. A. and White, W. B., J. Chem. Phys. 63, 2421 (1975); J. Non-Cryst. Solids 23, 261 (1977)10.1063/1.431671Google Scholar
3. Bliss, M. et al. , Nucl. Instrum. Methods, in press.Google Scholar
4. A description of the apparatus used is given in: Eschbach, P.A. and Miller, S.D., Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 47, 289 (1993).Google Scholar
5. Smith, H. L. and Cohen, A. J., Phys. and Chem. of Glasses 4, 173 (1963).Google Scholar