Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T07:41:47.755Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Structural properties of SiGe islands: Effect of capping

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Julian Stangl
Affiliation:
Institut für Halbleiterphysik, Johannes Kepler Universität, A-4040 Linz, Austria
Anke Hesse
Affiliation:
Institut für Halbleiterphysik, Johannes Kepler Universität, A-4040 Linz, Austria
Vaclav Holý
Affiliation:
Department of Solid State Physics, Faculty of Science, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
Günther Bauer
Affiliation:
Institut für Halbleiterphysik, Johannes Kepler Universität, A-4040 Linz, Austria
Ullrich Denker
Affiliation:
Max-Planck Institut für Festkörperforschung, Stuttgart, Germany
Oliver G. Schmidt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck Institut für Festkörperforschung, Stuttgart, Germany
O. Kirfel
Affiliation:
Paul-Scherrer Institut, Villingen, Switzerland
D. Gruützmacher
Affiliation:
Paul-Scherrer Institut, Villingen, Switzerland
Get access

Abstract

Self-organized nanostructures are increasingly important for novel optoelectronic devices, as high densities of quantum dots can be deposited directly during heteroepitaxial growth. Due to the elastic relaxation in 3D nanostructures, properties differing from 2D systems can be achieved, e.g., higher Ge contents in SiGe islands than in planar layers with the same total amount of Ge can be realized, enhancing the design freedom for, e.g., detectors or high frequency transistors. However, when such nanostructures are overgrown, which is inevitable for any application, they often undergo significant changes, partly eliminating their distinct advantages. We present an investigation of SiGe islands formed by deposition of pure Ge on Si (001). X-ray scattering and diffraction is employed to obtain the shape, strain and Ge distribution in uncapped as well as Si-capped islands. For the analysis, model calculations of the strain fields are required. The finite element method is used for uncapped islands, for buried nanostructures a novel analytical approach has been developed. For Tgrowth ∼ 650°C, optimized for island formation, the Ge content in the top part of uncapped islands reaches 100%, at an elastic relaxation of about 50%. During capping, the maximum Ge content considerably decreases to about 50%. At the same time, the islands become very flat, with a decrease in height from 13 to 6nm accompanied by an increase in base diameter from about 100 nm to 180 nm. The elastic relaxation decreases to about 2.5%, so that the buried islands have properties not very much different from 2D layers. Lowering the growth temperature for the Si cap, this effect can be avoided, for Tgrowth as low as 460°C, the structure of the uncapped islands can indeed be preserved.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Schmidt, O.G., Denker, U., Dashiell, M., Jin-Phillipp, N.Y., Eberl, K., Schreiner, R., Gräbeldinger, H., Schweizer, H., Christiansen, S., Ernst, F., Mat. Sci. Eng. B89, 101 (2002).Google Scholar
[2] Bimberg, D., Grundmann, M., and Ledentsov, N. N., Quantum Dot Heterostructures (Wiley, Chichester, 1999).Google Scholar
[3] For a series of articles on self-organized dots see, MRS Bulletin 23(2), (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Sutter, P., Lagally, M.G., Phys. Rev. Lett. 81, 3471 (1998).Google Scholar
[5] Mateeva, E., Sutter, P., and Lagally, M. G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 74, 567 (1999).Google Scholar
[6] Schmidt, O.G., Denker, U., Christiansen, S., Ernst, F., Appl. Phys. Lett. 81, 2614 (2002).Google Scholar
[7] Steinfort, A.J., Scholte, P.M.L.O., Ettema, A., Tuinstra, F., Nielsen, M., Landmark, E., Smilgies, D.M., Feidenhans'l, R., Falkenberg, G., Seehofer, L., Johnson, R.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 2009 (1996).Google Scholar
[8] Darhuber, A.A., Schittenhelm, P., Holý, V., Stangl, J., Bauer, G., Abstreiter, G., Phys. Rev. B 55, 15652 (1997).Google Scholar
[9] Metzger, T.H., Kegel, I., Paniago, R., Peisl, J., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 32, A202 (1999).Google Scholar
[10] Shen, Q., Kycia, S., Phys. Rev. B 55, 15791 (1997).Google Scholar
[11] Kegel, I., Metzger, T.H., Fratzl, P., Peisl, J., Lorke, A., Garcia, J.M., Petroff, P.M., Euro-phys. Lett. 45, 222 (1999).Google Scholar
[12] Wiebach, Th., Schmidbauer, M., Hanke, M., Raidt, H., Köhler, R., Wawra, H., Phys. Rev. B 61, 5571 (2000).Google Scholar
[13] Schmidbauer, M., Wiebach, Th., Raidt, H., Hanke, M., Köhler, R., Wawra, H., Phys. Rev. B 58, 10523 (1998).Google Scholar
[14] Levine, J.R., Cohen, J.B., Chung, Y.W., Georgopulos, P., J. Appl. Cryst. 22, 528 (1989).Google Scholar
[15] Levine, J.R., Cohen, J.B., Chung, Y.W., Surf. Sci. 248, 215 (1991).Google Scholar
[16] Rauscher, M., Paniago, R., Metzger, H., Kovats, Z., Domke, J., Peisl, J., Pfannes, H.D., Schulze, J., Eisele, I., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 6763 (1999).Google Scholar
[17] Roch, T., Holý, V., Hesse, A., Stangl, J., Fromherz, T., Bauer, G., Metzger, T.H., Ferrer, S., Phys. Rev. B 65, 245324 (2002).Google Scholar
[18] sample A contains a second layer of capped islands, but the scattering experiment has been performed in a geometry with grazing incidence, so that only the topmost layer of islands is visible.Google Scholar
[19] The growth temperature cannot be lowered arbitrarily, as this results in an increasing number of defects in the grown crystals.Google Scholar