Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T02:30:48.322Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

TEM Characterization of Al/Al2O3 Composite Fabricated by Reactive Metal Infiltration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Y. Gao
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Eng., New Mexico Inst. of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801
J. Jia
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Eng., New Mexico Inst. of Mining and Technology, Socorro, NM 87801
R. E. Loehman
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
K. G. Ewsuk
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185
Get access

Abstract

The microstructure of Al/α-Al2O3 composites made by infiltrating into dense mullite preforms has been characterized using transmission electron microscopy. Observations revealed that the formation of the Al/Al2O3 composites involves three stages. Initially, infiltrates into a dense mullite preform through grain boundary diffusion, and reacts with mullite at grain boundaries to form a partial reaction zone. Then, a complete reaction takes place in the reaction region between the partial reaction zone and the full reaction zone to convert the dense mullite preform to a composite of α-Al2O3 (matrix) and an Al-Si phase (thin channels). Finally, the reduced Si from the reaction diffuses out of the Al/A2O3 composite through the metal channels, whereas from the molten pool is continuously drawn to the reaction region until the mullite preform is consumed or the sample is removed from the molten pool. Based on the observed microstructure, infiltration mechanisms have been discussed, and a growth model of the composites is proposed in which the process involves repeated nucleation of Al2O3 grains and grain growth.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Koczak, M. J. and Premkumar, M. K., J. of Metals January, 44 (1993).Google Scholar
2. Newkirk, M. S., Lesher, H. D., White, D. R., Kennedy, C. R., Urquhart, A. W. and Claar, T. D., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 8, 879 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Lange, F. F., Velamakanni, B. V. and Evans, A. G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 388 (1990).Google Scholar
4. Loehman, R. E., Ewsuk, K. and Tomsia, A. P., submitted to J. Am. Ceram. Soc.Google Scholar
5. Aghajanian, M. K., Macmillan, N. H., Kennedy, C. R., Luszcz, S. J. and Roy, R., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 658 (1989).Google Scholar
6. Antolin, S., Nagelberg, A. S. and Creber, D. K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 447 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Newkirk, M. S., Urquhart, A. W. and Zwicker, H. R., J. Mater. Res. 1, 81 (1986).Google Scholar
8. Fareed, A. S., Sonuparlak, B., Lee, C. T., Fortini, A. J. and Schiroky, G. H., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc. 11, 782 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Breval, E., Aghajanian, M. K. and Luszcz, S. J., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 2610 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Jia, J., MS Thesis, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 1994.Google Scholar
11. Binary alloy phase diagrams, 2nd ed. (ASM International, Materials Park, Ohio, 1990).Google Scholar
12. Lihl, F., Nachtigall, E. and Schwaiger, A., Z. Metallkde 59, 213 (1968).Google Scholar
13. Gurp, G. J. van, J. Appl. Phys. 44, 2040 (1973).Google Scholar
14. Loehman, R. E. and Ewsuk, K., unpublished result.Google Scholar
15. Nagelberg, A. S., Antolin, S. and Urquhart, A. W., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 455 (1992).Google Scholar