Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T06:35:51.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Tight-Binding Theory of Phase-Change Materials

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Walter A. Harrison*
Affiliation:
walt@stanford.edu, Stanford University, Applied Physics, GLAM/McCullough Bldg., Stanford, CA, 94305, United States, 650 723 4224
Get access

Abstract

A simple theory of Ge, Sb, and Te crystals and glasses, based upon atomic valence orbitals with coupling given by universal parameters, is outlined. It is seen how dangling hybrids from Ge atoms can behave as negative U centers. In contrast, in Sb the nonbonding s orbitals play essentially no role, except to produce three-fold coordination and 90° bond angles. Te also has nonbonding s states, but also nonbonding p states causing two-fold coordination. These nonbonding p states form the top of the valence band, rather than the bond orbitals which formed the valence-band in Ge. We argue against lumping these totally different behaviors together as “lone pairs”. In the glass, bonds can form between all atom types, but bonds between different elements are energetically favored. Further, when Sb or Te atoms are involved, bonds can switch between neighbors with small energy change, in a manner suggested by Kastner, Adler and Fritsche. It is seen how to estimate the energy for these various different geometric configurations.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Harrison, Walter A., Elementary Electronic Structure, (World Scientific, Singapore, 1999), revised edition (2004).Google Scholar
2. Anderson, P. W. Phys. Rev. Letters 34, 953 (1975).Google Scholar
3. Kastner, Marc, Adler, David, and Fritzsche, H., Phys. Rev. Letters 37, 1504 (1976).Google Scholar
4. Bishop, S. G. Strom, U., and Taylor, P. C. Phys. Rev. Letters 34 1346 (1975).Google Scholar