Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T17:48:15.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

AFM-Based Nanomechanical Properties and Storage of Dentin and Enamel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 March 2011

Stefan Habelitz
Affiliation:
Dept of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, 707 Parnassus Ave. San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
Mehdi Balooch
Affiliation:
Dept of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, 707 Parnassus Ave. San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
Grayson W. Marshall
Affiliation:
Dept of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, 707 Parnassus Ave. San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
Thomas M. Breunig
Affiliation:
Dept of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, 707 Parnassus Ave. San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
Sally J. Marshall
Affiliation:
Dept of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California, 707 Parnassus Ave. San Francisco, CA 94143, USA;
Get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the affects of 2 different solutions, e. g. deionized water and Hanks' Balanced Salt Solution (HBSS), on nanohardness and elastic modulus of dentin and enamel from human third molars at storage times of 0, 1, 7, 14 and 28 days using a modified AFM (Triboscope). The pH values of the solutions were monitored throughout the test periods. Storing the specimens in deionized water resulted in a large decrease of mechanical properties, e.g. the reduced elastic modulus of dentin decreased from 24.0 ±1.5 GPa to 21.0 ±1.6, 8.6 ±1.1 and 5.2 ±1.1 GPa for storage times of 1, 7 and 14 days, respectively. Mechanical properties of dentin and enamel dropped by more than 12% after one day and more than 50% after a week when stored in deionized water. The observed changes in mechanical response were attributed to a superficial demineralization process during storage. In contrast, storing teeth in HBSS did not significantly alter the mechanical properties of dentin or enamel over the time studied.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

(1) Rho, J. Y.; Tsui, T. Y.; Pharr, G. M. Biomaterials 18, 1325 (1997).Google Scholar
(2) Kinney, J. H.; Balooch, M.; Marshall, S. J.; Marshall, G. W.; Weihs, T. P. J. Biomech. Eng. 118, 133 (1996).Google Scholar
(3) Habelitz, S.; Marshall, S. J.; Marshall, G. W.; Balooch, M. Arch. Oral Biol. 46, 173 (2001).Google Scholar
(4) Ten Cate, A. R. Oral Histology: Development, Structure, and Function (3rd Ed. Mosby, St. Louis, MO 1989).Google Scholar
(5) Marshall, G. W.; Marshall, S. J.; Kinney, J. H.; Balooch, M. J. Dent. 25, 441 (1997).Google Scholar
(6) Balooch, M.; Wu-Magidi, I. C.; Balazs, A.; Lundkvist, A. S. Marshall, S. J.; Marshall, G. W.; Siekhaus, W. J. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 40, 539 (1998).Google Scholar
(7) Oliver, W. C., Pharr, G. M. J. Mat. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).Google Scholar
(8) Kinney, J. H.; Balooch, M.; Marshall, S. J.; Marshall, G. W. Arch. Oral. Biol. 44, 813 (1999).Google Scholar
(9) Fong, H.; Sarikaya, M.; White, S. N.; Snead, M., L. Mat. Sci Eng. C 7, 119 (2000).Google Scholar