Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T15:06:53.449Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of the Front Facet Temperature in Laser Diode With Non Absorbing Mirror

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Tomasz Jan Ochalski ,
Dorota Pierscinska  and
Andrzej Malag
Tomasz Jan Ochalski
Affiliation:
ochalski@ite.waw.pl, Institute of Electron Technology, Al. Lotnikow 32/46, Warszawa, N/A, 02-668, Poland
Dorota Pierscinska
Affiliation:
dwawer@ite.waw.pl, Institute of Electron Technology, Poland
Andrzej Malag
Affiliation:
amalag@itme.edu.pl, Institute of Electronic Materials Technology, Poland
Get access

Abstract

Non-absorbing mirror (NAM) lasers, also known as window lasers, were developed to increase catastrophic optical damage level of the devices. In this work we present the analysis of the laser diodes (LD) front facet temperature distribution. Micro-thermoreflectance technique is used to perform a detailed temperature maps of the operating LDs. Such a technique gives us temperature maps with a high spatial resolution equal 0.6μm. We demonstrate micro thermoreflectance as a perfect tool to determine real temperature distribution of the operating laser diode front facet.

Keywords

optoelectronicphotoreflectanceIII-V
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 891: Symposium EE – Progress in Semiconductor Materials V – Novel Materials and Electronics and Optoelectronic Applications , 2005 , 0891-EE03-26
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Botez, D. and Connolly, J.C., Electron. Lett. 20, 530 (1984).Google Scholar
2 Epperlein, P. W., Bona, G. L., and Roentgen, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 60, 680 (1992).Google Scholar
3 Todoroki, S., Sawai, M., and Aiki, K., J. Appl. Phys. 58, 1124 (1985).Google Scholar
4 Brugger, H. and Epperlein, P. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 56, 1049 (1990).Google Scholar
5 Wawer, D., Ochalski, T. J., Piwoński, T., Wójcik-Jedlińska, A., Bugajski, M., Page, H., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a) 7, 1227 (2005).Google Scholar
6 Tomm, J.W., Strelchuk, V., Gerhardt, A., Zeimer, U., Zorn, M., Kissel, H., Weyers., M., J. Appl. Phys., 95, 1122 (2004).Google Scholar
7 Rinner, F., Rogg, J., Kelemen, M. T., Mikulla, M., Weimann, G., Tomm, J. W., Thamm, E., Poprawe., R., J. Appl. Phys., 93, 1848 (2003).Google Scholar