Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T23:11:34.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Applications of ZnO Nanowires as Electrode Materials in Photosynthetic Bio-Photoelectrochemical Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 June 2015

Houman Yaghoubi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Anand Kumar Santhanakrishn
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Md Khan
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
J. Thomas Beatty
Affiliation:
Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
Arash Takshi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Harvesting solar energy, is only one of the incentives of incorporating photosynthetic proteins in electrochemical devices. Understanding the interface of photosynthetic protein complexes and organic\inorganic underlying electrodes can give rise to development of new generation of nano-bioelectronics for other applications such as sensing, as well. Previous approaches in fabricating photosynthetic bio-hybrid electrochemical solar cells were mainly based on metallic electrodes with protein complexes attached, either directly or through linker molecules. Due to the energy band structure in semiconductors, they potentially can be useful for selective charge transfer in an electrochemical device. In the current study, a two terminal sealed bio-hybrid solar cell device was fabricated comprising of hydrothermally grown ZnO nanowires on fluorine doped tin oxide (FTO) glass working electrode, a Pt counter electrode, and methyl viologen (MV) as a single diffusible redox mediator. The ZnO working electrode was initially characterized using scanning electron microscopy (XRD) and X-ray diffraction (XRD). A solution of dimeric Rhodobacter sphaeroides – light harvesting 1 (RC-LH1) core complexes and redox electrolyte was injected into the cavity between working and counter electrodes. Such structure resulted in ∼0.64 µA.cm-2 photocurrent density and ∼0.24 V open circuit potential difference in the dark and under illumination. Additionally, the device stability tests demonstrated that the current response of such devices remained unchanged after 33 hours storage in the dark.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burt, E., Orris, P., Buchanan, S., Scientific Evidence of Health Effects from Coal Use in Energy Generation, University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, 2013.Google Scholar
Olson, J., Photosynth. Res. 88, 109 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blankenship, R. E., Tiede, D. M., Barber, J., Brudvig, G. W., Fleming, G., Ghirardi, M., Gunner, M. R., Junge, W., Kramer, D. M., Melis, A., Moore, T. A., Moser, C. C., Nocera, D., Nozik, A. J., Ort, D. R., Parson, W. W., Prince, R. C., Sayre, R. T., Science 332, 805 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van den Brink, J., J. Chem. Phys. 104, 1805 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Morgan, D., Raff, M., Roberts, K., Walter, P., Molecular Biology of the Cell; 6th ed.; Garland Science, 2014.Google Scholar
Yaghoubi, H., Takshi, A., Jun, D., Saer, R., Madden, J. D., Beatty, J. T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1414, mrsf11-1414-hh07-03, (2012); doi:10.1557/opl.2012.735. 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaghoubi, H., Li, Z., Jun, D., Saer, R., Slota, J.E., Beerbom, M., Schlaf, R., Madden, J.D., Beatty, J.T. and Takshi, A., J. Phys. Chem. C. 116(47), 24868 (2012).Google Scholar
Yaghoubi, H., Li, Z., Jun, D., Lafalce, E., Jiang, X., Schlaf, R., Beatty, J.T. and Takshi, A., J. Phys. Chem. C. 118(41), 23509 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaghoubi, H., Lafalce, E., Jun, D., Jiang, X., Beatty, J.T. and Takshi, A., Biomacromolecules. 16(4), 1112 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamran, M., Delgado, J.D., Friebe, V., Aartsma, T.J. and Frese, R.N., Biomacromolecules. 15(8), 2833 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caterino, R., Csiki, R., Lyuleeva, A., Pfisterer, J., Wiesinger, M., Janssens, S.D., Haenen, K., Cattani-Scholz, A., Stutzmann, M. and Garrido, J.A., ACS Appl. Mater. Inter. (2015) DOI: 10.1021/acsami.5b00711.Google Scholar
Trammell, S.A., Griva, I., Spano, A., Tsoi, S., Tender, L.M., Schnur, J. and Lebedev, N., J. Phys. Chem. C. 111(45), 17122 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takshi, A., Yaghoubi, H., Jun, D., Saer, R., Mahmoudzadeh, A., Madden, J. D., and Beatty, J. T., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc., 1414, mrsf11-1414-hh07-01, (2012).Google Scholar
O'Regan, B. and Gratzel, M., Nature. 353(6346), 737 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suemori, Y., Nagata, M., Nakamura, Y., Nakagawa, K., Okuda, A., Inagaki, J.-i., Shinohara, K., Ogawa, M., Iida, K., Dewa, T., Yamashita, K., Gardiner, A., Cogdell, R. and Nango, M., Photosynth. Res. 90(1), 17 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, S.C., Crouch, L.I., Jones, M.R. and Welland, M., Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 51(27), 6667 (2012).Google Scholar
Mershin, A., Matsumoto, K., Kaiser, L., Yu, D., Vaughn, M., Nazeeruddin, M.K., Bruce, B.D., Graetzel, M. and Zhang, S., Sci. Rep. 2, (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ebrahimi, H., Yaghoubi, H., Giammattei, F. and Takshi, A., Electrochim. Acta. 134(0), 435 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar