Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T08:44:51.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Atomistic Studies of Generic Tilt Grain Boundary Structures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

D. N. Pawaskar
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
R. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, Canada, S7N 5A9
R. Bai
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
A. Schwartzman
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
R. Phillips
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
C. L. Briant
Affiliation:
Division of Engineering, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912
Get access

Abstract

We investigate the atomic-scale structures of high-sigma (∑) tilt grain boundaries in aluminum using lattice statics calculations. In particular, we examine the efficacy of the structural unit model (SUM) in the context of long-period boundaries. Our investigation of both the equilibrium and metastable structures for certain high ∑ boundaries may necessitate a revision of the SUM formalism. We also consider further departures from high symmetry boundaries by considering the structural rearrangements induced by steps on boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sutton, A. P. and Baluffi, R. W., Interfaces in Crystaline Materials, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1995.Google Scholar
2. Wolf, D. and Yip, S., Materials Interfaces- Atomic-level structure and properties, 1st ed. (Chapman & Hallm London, 1992).Google Scholar
3. Merkle, K., J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 55, 991 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Garbacz, A., Raplph, B. and Kurzydlowski, K.J., Acta. Metall. Mater., 43, 1541 (1995).Google Scholar
5. Sutton, A.P. and Vitek, V., Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 309, 1 (1983).Google Scholar
6. Sutton, A.P., Prog. Mat. Sci., 36, 167 (1992)Google Scholar
7. Bai, R. Ph.D thesis, Brown University, 1998.Google Scholar
8. Shenoy, V.B., Miller, R., Tadmor, E.B., Rodney, D., Phillips, R. and Ortiz, M., J. Mech. Phy. Solids, in press, (1998).Google Scholar
9. Kronberg, M.L. and Wilson, F.H., Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Metall. Engrs., 185, 50 (1949).Google Scholar
10. Daw, M.S. and Baskes, M.I., Phy. Rev. Lett., 1, 1285 (1983).Google Scholar
11. Ercolessi, F. and Adams, J., Europhys. Lett., 26, 583 (1993).Google Scholar
12. Vitek, V., Sutton, A., Smith, D. and Pond, R., in Grain Boundary Structure and Kinetics, (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, Ohio, 1979), pp. 115148 Google Scholar
13. Rittner, J.D. and Seidman, D.N., Phy. Rev. B, 54, 6999 (1996).Google Scholar