Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-tfzs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T22:45:04.397Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Calculation of the Radiolytic Gas Production in Cemented Waste

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

P. Offermann
P. Offermann*
Affiliation:
Hahn-Meitner-Institut, Glienicker Str. 100. D-1000 Berlin 39, Federal Republic of Germany
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen production by radiolysis of water in cement waste forms has to be limited due to safety requirements. Specific generation rates (g-values) are derived from data obtained in laboratory scale experiments and measurements on 200 1 drums containing real waste. To interpret the data model calculations are carried out including those for PH, dose rate, nitrate concentration and diffusion. An OH depleting reaction is added to the radiolytical reaction mechanism of water to model the hydrogen production rate observed for γ-irradiated cement.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 127: Symposium BERLIN – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XII , 1988 , 461
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Bibler, N.E., Orebaugh, E.G., Report DP-1459 (1977)Google Scholar
2. Möcke, H., Koster, L.R., Nucl. Tech. 59, 494(1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Bibler, N.E.. Report DP-1464 (1978)Google Scholar
4. Scheffler, K., in Report KfK 2519 edited by Krause, H. (1977)Google Scholar
5. Kroth, K., Brodda, B.G., Niephaus, D., Jahrestagung Kerntechnik 88, Travem. (1988)Google Scholar
6. Bibler, N.E., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management II, ed. by Northrup, C.J.M., Plenum Press, New York, 585 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Kunze, S. (Private communication)Google Scholar
8. Lammertz, H., Kroth, K., Report Jül-Spez-430 (1988)Google Scholar
9. Bamert, E., Briicher, H., Niephaus Report, D. IAEA-SM-289/46Google Scholar
10. Flatherby, J.E., Fujita, A., Deltete, C.P.. Quinn, G.J., Report GEND-041(1986)Google Scholar
11. Kroth, K., in Report Jiil-Conf-60, ed. by Bamert, E. (1987)Google Scholar
12. Henglein, A., Schnabel, W., Wendenburg, J., Einführung in die Strahlenchemie, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim (1969)Google Scholar
13. Draganic, I.G.. Draganic, Z.D., The Radiation Chemistry of Water, Pergamon Press, New York (1960)Google Scholar
14. Bjergbakke, E., Sehested, K., Lang Rasmussen, O., Cliristensen, H., Report RISO-M-2430 (1984)Google Scholar
15. Deuflhard, P., Nowak, U., Report SC-86–1 (1986)Google Scholar
16. Christensen, H., Bjergbakke, E., Report KBS TR 84–02Google Scholar
17. Rasmussen, O.L., Bjergbakke, E.. Report RISO-R-395Google Scholar
18. Hayon, E., Moreau, M., J. Phys. Chem. 69, 4058(1965)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Mahlmann, H.A., J. Chem. Phys. 32, 60 (1960)Google Scholar
20. Kuppermann, A., Radiation Research 1966. North-Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam (1967)Google Scholar
21. Christensen, H., Bjergbakke, E., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 50, 401 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Allen, A.O., The Radiation Chemistry of Water and Aqueous Solutions, D. Van Nostrand Company, New York (1961)Google Scholar