Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-hp6zs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-26T21:40:27.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cemical Durability of a Multicomponent Glass in a Simulated Carnallite/Rock Salt Environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

R. Conradt ,
H. Roggendorf  and
H. Scholze
R. Conradt
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer-Institut für Silicatforschung, Würzburg, Germany
H. Roggendorf
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer-Institut für Silicatforschung, Würzburg, Germany
H. Scholze
Affiliation:
Fraunhofer-Institut für Silicatforschung, Würzburg, Germany
Get access

Extract

The long term corrosion behaviour of the German HLW glass SM 58 LW 11, doped with 11 vt.% of inactive waste, was investigated in a simulated carnallite/rock salt environment. The experimental conditions were defined with respect to a hypothetical water entrance to a rock salt repository, i.e. temperatures up to 200°C and a pressure of 130 bar were applied; a specific brine from the quinary system MgCl2-MgSO4-NaCl-KCI-H2O (the so-called Q-brine [1] served as leachant. The effects of the corrosion were determined by weight loss measurements, by analyses of the leachates, and by the application of surface analytical techniques.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. D'Ans, J., Die Löslichkeitsgleichgewichte der Systeme der Salze ozeanischer Salzablagerungen (Verlagsgesellschaft fü Ackerbau, Berlin 1933).Google Scholar
2. Scholze, H., Conradt, R., Engelke, H., and Roggendorf, H., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 11 173–180 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Clark, D.E. and Hench, L.L., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 15 113–124 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Barkatt, A., Simmons, J.H., Macedo, P.B., Nucl. Chem. Waste Manage. 2 3–23 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Grambow, B., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 11 93–102 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Wallace, R.M. and Wicks, G.G., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 15 23–28 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Lutze, W., Malow, G., and Rabe, H., Mat.Res.Soc.Symp.Proc. 15 37–45 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Thomas, L.A., Wooster, N., and Wooster, W.A., Disc.Faraday Soc. 5 341–345 (1949).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Kennedy, G.C., Econ.Geol. 45 629–653 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Marshall, W.L., Geochim. Cosmochim.Acta 44 907–913 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Marshall, W.L. and Warakomski, I.M., Geochim.Cosmochim.Acta 44, 915–921 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar