Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-08T16:58:01.359Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes in spent nuclear fuel due to dry interim storage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2012

L. Duro
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting, S.L., P. Garcia Faria 49-51, 1-1, Barcelona, E-08019, Spain
O. Riba
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting, S.L., P. Garcia Faria 49-51, 1-1, Barcelona, E-08019, Spain
A. Martínez-Esparza
Affiliation:
EMPRESA NACIONAL DE RESIDUOS RADIACTIVOS S.A C/ Emilio Vargas, 7 Madrid, E-28043 Spain.
J. Bruno
Affiliation:
Amphos 21 Consulting, S.L., P. Garcia Faria 49-51, 1-1, Barcelona, E-08019, Spain
Get access

Abstract

The assessment of the main changes expected for spent nuclear fuel from its discharge to its deposition in a deep geological repository is of the outmost relevance to establish the initial conditions of the disposal. In this work, a literature review and a critical discussion of the main processes that will affect the structure and the inventory of the spent nuclear fuel during its interim dry storage is presented. Once the irradiation period is finished, the following changes are observed: i) the fuel pellet is fragmented due to the temperature gradient established during the irradiation stage. On average between 10-15 fragments are observed per pellet. ii) the initial gap existing between the pellet and the cladding decreases or disappears depending on the burnup. iii) a radial zonation is observed in the microstructure of the pellet. For burnup over 40MWd/KgU, the rim develops a porosity increase due to the high local burnup and the low temperature in the periphery. The rim also presents small bubbles of fission gases. This high burnup structure implies a degradation of the thermic conductivity in the pellet, that leads to a temperature increase in the center of the pellet with a subsequent migration of the fission gases and other impurities to the grain boundaries. The implications that all these changes may have on the spent fuel behaviour is presented and discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. NRC (U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2008) (10 CFR 72).Google Scholar
2. Ferry, C., Poinssot, C., Cappelaere, C., Desgranges, L., Jegou, C., Miserque, F., Piron, J.P., Roudil, D., Gras, J.M., J. Nucl. Mat. 352, 246 (2006).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.02.061Google Scholar
3. NRC ISG-11. Interim Staff Guidance – 11, Rev. 3 (2003).Google Scholar
4. Martínez-Esparza, A., Clarens, F., Gonzalez-Robles, E., Gimenez, F.J., Casas, I., De Pablo, J., Serrano, D., Wegen, D., Glatz, J.P., ENRESA technical report 04-2009 (2009).Google Scholar
5. Ferry, C., Piron, J.P., Ambard, A., J. Nucl. Mat. 407, 100 (2010).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2010.09.034Google Scholar
6. Spino, J., Papaioannou, D., J. Nucl. Mat. 372, 23, 416 (2008).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2007.03.173Google Scholar
7. Dehaudt, P., Dubois, S., Maguin, J.C., Huet, F., Pelletier, M., Lacroix, B., Pasquet, B., Guérin, Y., Hourdequin, N., Salot, R., Desgranges, L., Delette, G., Struzik, C., CEA-R-5923 (2000).Google Scholar
8. Forsyth, R., SKB 97–25 (1997).10.1016/S0363-8111(99)80102-7Google Scholar
9. Johnson, L.H., McGinnes, D.F. Nagra, D.F Technical Report NTB 02-07 (2002)Google Scholar
10. Johnson, L., Ferry, C., Poinssot, C., Lovera, P., J. Nucl. Mat. 346, 56 (2005)10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.04.071Google Scholar
11. Spino, J., IAEA-TECDOC-1036, (1998).Google Scholar
12. Koo, Y.-H., Lee, B.-H., Cheon, J.-S., Sohn, D.-S., J. Nucl. Mat. 295, 213 (2001).10.1016/S0022-3115(01)00535-9Google Scholar
13. Györi, C., Hózer, Z., , Z. In ‘Proceedings of the IAEA International Conference: Storage of Spent Fuel from Power Reactors’ (2003).Google Scholar
14. NRC, NUREG-1536, Rev 1A (2009).Google Scholar
15. Astm C 1553 – 2008, ASTM International, pp. 1–16.Google Scholar
16. Sugisaki, M., Hashizume, K., Hatano, Y.. IAEA-TECDOC-1316 (2002).Google Scholar
17. Kim, Y. S., J. Nucl. Mater. 378, 30 (2008).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.04.011Google Scholar
18. Kim, Y. S., Metal. Mater. Trans. A 40A, 2867 (2009).10.1007/s11661-009-0044-6Google Scholar
19. Leenaers, A., Verwerft, M., Boulanger, D., Itagaki, N., Matsumura, T., ICEM’01 (2001)Google Scholar
20. Guilbert, S., Sauvage, T., Garcia, Ph., Carlot, G., Barthe, M.F., Desgardin, P., Blondiaux, G., Corbel, C., Piron, J.P., Gras, J.M., J. Nucl. Mater. 327,8896 (2004).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2004.01.024Google Scholar
21. Roudil, D., Bonhoure, J., Pik, R., Cuney, M., Jegou, C., Gauthier-Lafaye, F., J. Nucl. Mater., 378, 70 (2008).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.05.001Google Scholar
22. Chao, C.K., Yang, K.C., Tseng, C.C., Nucl. Eng. Des. 238, 124 (2008).10.1016/j.nucengdes.2007.06.005Google Scholar
23. Olander, D., J. Nucl. Mater., 389, 1 (2009).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.01.297Google Scholar
24. Nrc, Final Report, NUREG-1536 (1997).Google Scholar
25. Allen, G.C., Tempest, P.A., Tyler, J.W., Nature, 295, 4849 (1982).10.1038/295048a0Google Scholar
26. Hanson, B., PNNL-11929 Report (1998)Google Scholar
27. Rouyer, J., Poulesquen, A., Desgranges, L., Ferry, C., J. Nucl. Mater. 395, 89 (2009).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2009.09.023Google Scholar
28. Serrano, J.A., ENRESA technical report 12-2000 (2000).Google Scholar
29. Rouault, J., Girardin, J., Proc. Workshop on Chemical Rectivity of Oxide Fuel and Fission Product Release, Berkeley, UK, p. 245 (1987)Google Scholar
30. Einziger, R.E., Thomas, L.E., Buchanan, H.C., Stout, R.B., J. Nucl. Mater. 190, 53, (1992).10.1016/0022-3115(92)90075-VGoogle Scholar
31. Desgranges, L., Ferroud-Plattet, M.P., Giacalone, H., Aubrun, I., Untrau, J.M., NT DEC/SA3C/L2EC – 006 – indice 0, Personal Communication (2007).Google Scholar
32. Choi, J-W, McEachern, R.J., Taylor, P., Wood, D.D., J. Nucl. Mater. 230, 250 (1996).10.1016/0022-3115(96)80022-5Google Scholar
33. Quemard, L., Desgranges, L., Bouineau, V., Pijolat, M., Baldinozzi, G., Millot, N., Niepce, J.C., Poulesquen, A., J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 29, 27912798 (2009).10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.04.010Google Scholar
34. Rigby, D.B., United States Nuclear Waste Technical Review Board (2010).Google Scholar