Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-16T20:08:16.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of Nano-Sized Particles for Propulsion Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Grant A. Risha ,
Eric Boyer ,
Brian Evans ,
Kenneth K. Kuo  and
Rafaat Malek
Grant A. Risha
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Eric Boyer
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Brian Evans
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Kenneth K. Kuo
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical and Nuclear Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Rafaat Malek
Affiliation:
Materials Research Institute, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Energetic nano-sized particles have been shown to have a great potential for use in the aerospace propulsion applications. Some of the unique combustion properties of nano-particles such as very rapid ignition and short combustion times make them particularly valuable for propulsion systems; they can be included in solid fuels, solid propellants, or even as energetic gellant in liquid systems. However, due to the novelty of the application and rapid development of production techniques, there is no comprehensive understanding of what characteristics of a nano-sized particle are important in contributing to desirable performance and ease of processing into a final usable form. Previous studies have shown that HTPB-based solid fuels containing various types of nano-sized particles showed differing performance results when tested in the same hybrid rocket motor under identical conditions. Many of these particles have data available only on the basic composition (aluminum, boron, boron carbide, etc.), average diameter, and/or BET surface area. In order to better understand and correlate observed combustion behavior with intrinsic material properties, the particles of interest need to be better characterized. A variety of standard particle characterization techniques were applied to the fifteen types of particles examined in this study and the results tabulated. Some of the parameters measured were average particle diameter, specific surface area, amount of active content, and oxide layer thickness. Trends in propulsion performance measured using a parameter of great interest to the hybrid rocket community (fuel mass burning rate) in general matched trends in particle characteristics (i.e. active content, surface area), but there were some noticeable exceptions. This study indicates that there is still much more to learn about the correlation between physical and chemical properties and measured combustion performance. Other parameters that should be examined in the future include particle size distribution, degree of agglomeration, reactivity and thermal effects (oxidation rate, onset temperature for oxidation exotherm, heat release associated with any excess stored energy), etc.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 800: Symposium AA – Synthesis, Characterization, and Properties of Energetic/Reactive Nanomaterials , 2003 , AA6.6
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nanotechnologies website, URL: http://www.nanoscale.com/ Google Scholar
2. Kuo, K. K., Risha, G. A., Evans, B. J., and Boyer, E., “Potential Usage of Energetic Nano-sized Powders for Combustion and Rocket Propulsion,” Invited Paper to be presented at the 2003 MRS Fall Meeting, Boston, MA (2003).Google Scholar
3. Chiaverini, M. J., et al., “Regression Rate Behavior of Hybrid Rocket Solid Fuels,” Journal of Propulsion and Power 16, No. 1, 125–132 (2000)Google Scholar
4. Mench, M. M., Yeh, C. L., and Kuo, K. K., Energetic Materials Production, Processing and Characterization, 29th International ICT Conference, 3–01 to 3–05, (1998).Google Scholar
5. Mordosky, J. W., et al., “Spray Combustion of Gelled RP-1 Propellants Containing Nano-sized Aluminum Particles in Rocket Engine Conditions,” Paper 2001–3274, 37th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Salt Lake City, UT (2001).Google Scholar
6. Ellison, R., Hall, T., and Moser, M., “Gelled RP-1 Nanophase Aluminum Propellant,” Paper 2003–4498, 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Huntsville, AL (2003).Google Scholar
7. Laritchev, M. N., et al., “Aluminum Nanoparticles as the Energy Source for Mars Conditions (Multi-Sample Return Mission, Power Plants), Part 2,” Paper 2003–4443, 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Huntsville, AL (2003).Google Scholar
8. Kuo, K.K., “Importance and Challenges of Hybrid Rocket Propulsion Beyond Year 2000,” Invited von Kármán Lecture in the Proceedings of the 37th Israel Annual Conference on Aerospace Sciences, II–1 to II-31 (1997).Google Scholar
9. Strand, L. D., Ray, R. L., Anderson, F. A., and Cohen, N. S., “Hybrid Rocket Fuel Combustion and Regression Rate Study,” Paper 92–3302, 28th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Nashville, TN (1992).Google Scholar
10. Teague, W., Wright, A., Balkanli, D., and Hybl, L., “Effect of Energetic Fuel Additives on the Temperature of Hybrid Rocket Combustion,” Paper 99–2138, 35th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Los Angeles, CA (1999).Google Scholar
11. Strand, L D., Ray, R. L., and Cohen, N. S., “Hybrid Rocket Combustion Study,” Paper 93–2412, 29th AIAA/SAE/ASME/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Monterey, CA (1993).Google Scholar
12. Risha, G. A., Boyer, E., Wehrman, R. B., and Kuo, K.K., “Performance Comparison of HTPB-Based Solid Fuels Containing Nano-Sized Energetic Powder in a Cylindrical Hybrid Rocket Motor,” Paper 2002–3576, 38th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Indianapolis, IN (2002).Google Scholar
13. Risha, G. A., Evans, B. J., Boyer, E., Wehrman, R. B., and Kuo, K. K., “Nano-Sized Aluminum-and Boron-Based Solid-Fuel Characterization in a Hybrid Rocket Engine”, Paper 2003–4593, 39th AIAA/ASME/SAE/ASEE Joint Propulsion Conference, Huntsville, AL (2003).Google Scholar
14. Risha, G. A., “Enhancement of Hybrid Rocket Combustion Performance Using Nano-Sized Energetic Particles,” Ph.D. Dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, August 2003.Google Scholar
15. Marxman, G. A., and Gilbert, M., “Turbulent Boundary Layer Combustion in the Hybrid Rocket,” Ninth Symposium (International) on Combustion, Academic Press, Inc., New York, 371–383 (1963)Google Scholar
16. Personal communication with Dr. C. C. Johnson of NAWC-China Lake (2002).Google Scholar
17. Aluminum flake micrographs courtesy of Dr. M. Chan of NAWC-China Lake (June 2002).Google Scholar
18. Johnson, C. E. and Higa, K. T., “Preparation of Nanometer Sized Aluminum Powders,” JANNAF Propellant Development and Characterization/Safety and Environmental Protection Subcommittee Joint Meeting, CPIA Pub. 647, Vol I, 137–142, (1997).Google Scholar