Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:42:49.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characterization of the Damage on the Back Side of Silicon Wafers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

S. E. Lindo ,
K. M. Matney  and
M. S. Goorsky
S. E. Lindo
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1595
K. M. Matney
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1595
M. S. Goorsky
Affiliation:
University of California, Los Angeles, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Los Angeles, CA 90095–1595
Get access

Abstract

Gettering represents a standard procedure to remove harmful impurities from device active regions of a silicon wafer. An affordable technique for the creation of a defect free (denuded) zone is the introduction of gettering sites on the wafer back side via mechanical damage (i.e. lapping). However, optimizing the extrinsic gettering process requires a technique to quantify the extent of damage introduced through a typical back-side damaging step. Here, we present results from a study using triple axis x-ray diffraction. We characterized the level of damage present in wafers subjected to different lapping conditions. By comparing reciprocal space maps from samples that had undergone different lapping steps, we concluded that all the as-lapped samples showed similar levels of damage in terms of both strain variations and lattice tilts. However, the integrated diffuse scattering intensities decreased from medium to soft t.-double-soft lapping, which confirmed that the double soft lapping introduced the least damage. Typically, the damage step introduced a symmetrical distribution of both lattice strain and lattice tilts (mosaicity) in the surface layer. KOH etching was employed to determine the depth of the damaged layer. In all cases the as-lapped samples had integrated intensities two orders of magnitude greater than those of the etched samples. Analysis of the residual damage present in the lapped samples after chemical etching confirmed that the more aggressive lapping conditions introduced damage of greater depth.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 378: Symposium B – Defect and Impurity-Engineered Semiconductors and Devices , 1995 , 315
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Cerofolini, G. F., Meda, L., Physical Chemistry of, in and on Silicon, (Springer-Verlag Publication, Berlin, New York, 1989).Google Scholar
2. Cane, C., Lozano, M., Cabruja, E., Esteve, J. Gracia, E., Serra, F., and Fonseca, L., Deffects of Silicon II, edited by Bullis, W. M., Gosele, U. and Shimura, F. (The Electrochemical Society, Inc., New Jersey, 1991) pp 643.Google Scholar
3. Sadana, D. K., Impurity Diffusion and Gettering in Silicon, edited by Chen, R.B., Pearce, C. W., and Washburn, J. (Mat. Res. Soc. Proa, 36, Pittsbrugh, PN) pp. 245.Google Scholar
4. Tan, T. Y., Gardner, E. E. and Tice, W. K., Appl. Phys. Lett., 30, 175 (1977).Google Scholar
5. Yang, K. H., Kappert, H. F. and Schwuttke, G., Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 50, 221 (1978).Google Scholar
6. Lawrence, J. E., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME 242, 484 (1968).Google Scholar
7. Yang, K. H. and Schwuttke, G. H., Phys. Stat. Sol. A, 58, (1980).Google Scholar
8. Fewster, P. F., Appl. Surf. Sci., 50, 9 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Iida, A. and Kohra, K., Phys. Stat. Sol. (a), 51, 533 (1979).Google Scholar
10. Wang, V. S. and Matyi, R. J., J. Appl. Phys., 72, 5158 (1992).Google Scholar