Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T19:21:57.171Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparative Study of the Nanocrystalline Material Produced by Sliding Wear and Inert Gas Condensation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

S. K. Ganapathi ,
M. Aindow ,
H. L. Fraser  and
D. A. Rigney
S. K. Ganapathi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH-43210–1179.
M. Aindow
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH-43210–1179.
H. L. Fraser
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH-43210–1179.
D. A. Rigney
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH-43210–1179.
Get access

Abstract

A High Resolution Electron Microscopy (HREM) study of grain boundaries in nanocrystalline copper produced by sliding wear and by inert gas condensation is described. The results in both cases are essentially the same and similar to those in conventional polycrystals. Contrary to reports in the literature, these results do not indicate the presence of a fundamentally different structure in nanocrystalline materials. Measurements of the mechanical properties (such as yield strength, elastic modulus and strain rate sensitivity) of these materials using nanoindentation are also presented. These are found to be in good agreement with values expected from a polycrystalline material with a very fine grain size.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 206: Symposium G – Clusters and Cluster-Assembled Materials , 1990 , 593
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rigney, D. A., Naylor, M. G. S., Divakar, R., Ives, L. K., Materials Sci. and Eng. 81, 409 (1986).Google Scholar
2. Antoniou, R., Ph. D. Thesis, Univ. of Melbourne, 1988.Google Scholar
3. Birringer, R. and Gleiter, H. in Encyclopedia of Materials Science and Engineering, Suppl. Vol. 1, edited by Cahn, R. W., (Pergamon press, Oxford, 1988) pp. 339.Google Scholar
4. Siegel, R. W. and Hahn, H., in Current Trends in the Physics of Materals. edited by Yussouff, M. (World Scientific Publ. Co., Singapore, 1987), pp. 403.Google Scholar
5. Mutschele, T. and Kirchheim, R., Scripta Metall. 21, 135 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Mutschele, T. and Kirchheim, R., Scripta Metall. 21, 1101 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Wunderlich, W., Ishida, Y., Maurer, R., Scripta Metall. 24, 403 (1990).Google Scholar
8. Thomas, G. J., Siegel, R. W., Eastman, J. A., Scripta Metall. 24, 201 (1990).Google Scholar
9. ASTM Standard Designation D2714 - 68 (Reapproved 1983).Google Scholar
10. Ganapathi, S. K., Ph. D. dissertation, The Ohio State University, 1990.Google Scholar
11. Doerner, M. F. and Nix, W. D., J. Mater. Res. 1 4, 601 (1986).Google Scholar
12. Mayo, M. J. and Nix, W. D., Acta Metall. 36, 8, 2183 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Treacy, M. M. J., Gibson, J. M., Howie, A., Phil. Mag A 51, 3, 389 (1985).Google Scholar
14. Kirchheim, R., (private communication).Google Scholar
15. Mayo, M. J. and Nix, W. D., Acta Metall. 37, 4, 1121 (1989).Google Scholar