Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:49:27.031Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Computer Simulation of Strain Energy and Surface- and Interface-Energy on Grain Growth in Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

R. Carel
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA
C. V. Thompson
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, MIT, Cambridge, MA
H. J. Frost
Affiliation:
Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH.
Get access

Abstract

We have simulated strain energy effects and surface- and interface-energy effects on grain growth in thin films, using properties of polycrystalline Ag (p-Ag) on single crystal (001) Ni on (001) MgO for comparison with experiments. Surface- and interface-energy and strain energy reduction drive the growth of grains of specific crystallographic orientations. The texture that will result when grain growth has occurred minimizes the sum of these driving forces. In the elastic regime, strain energy density differences result from the orientation dependence of the elastic constants of the biaxially strained films. In the plastic regime, strain energy also depends on grain diameter and film thickness. In p-Ag/(001) Ni, surface- and interface-energy minimization favors Ag grains with (11) texture. In the absence of a grain growth stagnation, the texture at later times is always (111). However, for high enough strains and large enough thicknesses, the strain energy driving force can favor a (001) texture at early times, which reverts to a (111) texture at later times, once the grains have yielded.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Atkinson, H. V., Acta. Metall. 36, 469 (1988)Google Scholar
2. Frost, H. J., Thompson, C. V., Howe, C. L., and Whang, J., Scripta Met. 22, 65 (1988)Google Scholar
3. Frost, H. J., Thompson, C. V., and Walton, D., Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 1455 (1990)Google Scholar
4. Frost, H. J., Thompson, C. V., and Walton, D., Acta Metall. Mater. 40, 779 (1990)Google Scholar
5. Frost, H. J., Hayashi, Y. and Thompson, C. V., MRS Symp. Proc. 317 (1994)Google Scholar
6. Thompson, C. V., Floro, J. A., and Smith, Henry I., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 4099 (1990)Google Scholar
7. Kim, H. J. and Thompson, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 757 (1990)Google Scholar
8. Nix, W. D., Met. Trans. 20A, 2217 (1989)Google Scholar
9. Floro, J. A., Thompson, C. V., Carel, R., and Bristowe, P. D., submitted to J. of Mat. Res.Google Scholar
10. Sanchez, J. E. Jr. and Arzt, E., Scripta Metall. Mater. 27, 285 (1992)Google Scholar
11. Chaudhari, P., IBM J. Res. Develop., 197 (1969)Google Scholar
12. Freund, L. B., J. Appl. Mech. 54, 553 (1987)Google Scholar
13. Venkatraman, R. and Bravman, J. C., J. Mat. Res. 7, 2040 (1992)Google Scholar
14. Thompson, C. V., Scripta Met. et Mat. 28, 167 (1993)Google Scholar
15. Floro, J. A., Carel, R., and Thompson, C. V., MRS Symp. Proc. 317 (1994)Google Scholar
16. Gao, Y., Dregia, S. A., and Shewmon, P. G., Acta Metall. 37, 1627 (1989)Google Scholar
17. Gao, Y., Dregia, S. A., and Shewmon, P. G., Acta Metall. 37, 3165 (1989)Google Scholar
18. Johnson, W. A. and Mehl, R. F., Trans. Am. Inst. Min. Engrs 135, 416 (1939)Google Scholar
19. Mullins, W. W., Acta Metall. 6, 414 (1958)Google Scholar
20. Frost, H. J., Thompson, C. V., and Walton, D., Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 1455 (1990)Google Scholar
21. Thompson, C. V., Frost, H. J., and Carel, R., unpublished.Google Scholar