Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-m8qmq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T13:04:16.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Conformational and Dynamic Properties of Polymer Loops and Their Mixtures at an Impenetrable Interface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

H. S. Gulati
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
D. C. Driscoll
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
R. L. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
R. J. Spontak
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
C. K. Hall
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695
Get access

Abstract

In this study we investigate the equilibrium conformational properties and dynamic relaxation behavior of polymer loops grafted at an interface using the discontinuous molecular dynamics simulation technique. Differences and similarities between the structural and dynamic properties of polymer loops and tails are identified. The conformational properties of mixtures of polymers loops and tails are also studied using the bond-fluctuation method. The effect of mixture composition on the conformational properties of the individual components in the mixture is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wu, S., Polymer Interfaces and Adhesion. (Dekker, New York, 1982).Google Scholar
2. Alexander, S., J. Phys. (Paris), 38, 983 (1977).Google Scholar
3. de Germes, P. G., Macromolecules, 13, 1070 (1980).Google Scholar
4. Milner, S. T., Witten, T. A., and Cates, M. E., Macromolecules, 21, 2610 (1988).Google Scholar
5. Murat, M. and Grest, G. S., Macromolecules, 24, 704 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Lai, P.-Y. and Zhulina, E. B., J. Phys. II (France), 2, 547 (1992).Google Scholar
7. Marko, J. F. and Chakrabarti, A., Phys. Rev. Lett., 48, 2739 (1993).Google Scholar
8. Rapaport, D. C, J. Chem. Phys., 71, 3299 (1979).Google Scholar
9. Gulati, H. S., Hall, C. K., Jones, R. L., and Spontak, R. J., J. Chem. Phys., 105, 7712 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Smith, S. W., Freeman, B. D., and Hall, C. K., J. Comput. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
11. Deutsch, H.-P. and Dickman, R., J. Chem. Phys., 93, 8983 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Jones, R. L. and Spontak, R. J., J. Chem. Phys., 103, 5137 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Murat, M. and Grest, G. S., Macromolecules, 22, 4054 (1989).Google Scholar
14. Lai, P.-Y. and Binder, K., J. Chem. Phys., 95, 9288 (1991).Google Scholar
15. Klushin, L. I. and Skvortsov, A. M., Macromolecules, 24, 1549 (1991).Google Scholar
16. McQuarrie, D. A., Statistical Mechanics. (Harper and Row, New York, 1973).Google Scholar