Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-19T16:35:26.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Contactless Characterization of the Surface Property of the Si+-Implanted GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Akira Usami
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya 466, JAPAN
Hideaki Yoshida
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya 466, JAPAN
Masaya Ichimura
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya 466, JAPAN
Takao Wada
Affiliation:
Nagoya Institute of Technology, Gokiso, Showa, Nagoya 466, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

The surface recombination of GaAs which has a high carrier concentration layer (HCCL) formed by Si+ implantation has been investigated using the reflectance microwave probe (RMP) method. The RMP method enables us to evaluate the surface property of GaAs contactlessly and easily. The experimental results of the samples which were implanted with doses ranging from 1.0×1011 to 3.9×1012cm-2 at an energy of lOOke V indicate that the effective surface recombination velocity decreases with dosage because of HCCL formed after the annealing. On the other hand, the results of the samples which were implanted with a dose of 3.9 × 1012cm-2 at energies ranging from 30 to 180keV indicate that the effective surface recombination velocity increases with energy for energies larger than 50keV. We understood the reason by comparing with the numerical calculation results of an effective surface recombination velocity at a high-low junction interface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Hayashi, I. and Panish, M.B., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 150 (1970)Google Scholar
[2] Ettenberg, M. and Paff, R.J., J. Appl. Phys., 41, 3926 (1970)Google Scholar
[3] Ito, A., Usami, A., and Wada, T., J. Appl. Phys., 71, 4088 (1992)Google Scholar
[4] Dutton, R.W. and Whitter, R.J., IEEE Tans. Electron Devices, ED–16, 458 (1969)Google Scholar
[5] Usami, A., Kitagawa, A., and Wada, T., Appl. Phys. Lett., 54, 831 (1989)Google Scholar
[6] Usami, A., Tokuda, Alto Y., Kano, R., and Wada, T., J. Cryst. Growth, 103, 350 (1990)Google Scholar
[7] Sell, D.D. and Casey, H.X. Jr, J. Appl. Phys., 45, 800 (1974)Google Scholar
[8] Nakamura, T. and Katoda, T., J. Appl. Phys., 53, 5870 (1982)Google Scholar
[9] Hauser, J.R. and Dunbar, P.M., Solid-St. Electron., 18, 715 (1975)Google Scholar
[10] Sinha, A. and Chattopadhyaya, S.K., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–25, 1412 (1978)Google Scholar
[11] Fossum, J.G., Nasby, R.D., and Pao, S.C., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices. ED–27, 785 (1980)Google Scholar
[12] Ram, G.V. and Tyagi, M.S., Solid-St. Electron., 24, 753 (1981)Google Scholar
[13] Lindhard, J., Scharff, M., and Schoitt, H., Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk., 23, 1 (1963)Google Scholar
[14] Gibbons, J.F., Johnson, W.S., and Mylroie, S.W., “Projected Range Statistics”, Semiconductors & related Materials (2nd edition), John Willy & Sons Google Scholar
[15] Tayor, G.W., Darley, H.M., Frye, R.C., and Chatterjee, P.K., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, ED–26, 172 (1979)Google Scholar
[16] Hyuga, F., J. Appl. Phys., 64, 3880 (1988)Google Scholar
[17] Donnelly, J.P., Lindley, W.T., and Hurwitz, C.E., Appl. Phys. Lett., 27, 41 (1975)Google Scholar
[18] Tandon, J.L., Nicolet, M.A., and Eisen, F.H., Appl. Phys. Lett., 34, 165 (1979)Google Scholar
[19] Kuzuhara, M., Kohzu, K., and Takayama, Y., Appl. Phys. Lett., 41, 755 (1982)Google Scholar
[20] Yeo, Y.K., Hengehold, R.L., Kim, Yong Yun, Ezis, A., Park, Y.S., and Ehret, J.E., J. Appl. Phys., 58, 4083 (1985)Google Scholar