Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T14:45:21.866Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crichtonite Structure Type (Am21O38 and A2M19O36) as a Host Phase in Crystalline Waste Form Ceramics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

W. L. Gong ,
R. C. Ewing ,
L. M. Wang  and
H. S. Xie
W. L. Gong
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
R. C. Ewing
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
L. M. Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA
H. S. Xie
Affiliation:
Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guiyang, Guizhou 550002, P.R. China
Get access

Abstract

Previous studies of ceramic crystalline waste forms, e.g. Synroc, tailored ceramics, and supercalcine, have concentrated on phases which are major constituents in the formulations: zirconolite, pyrochlore, hollandite, perovskite and zircon. These phases usually occur as members of multi-phase assemblages which are required for the incorporation of the wide variety of radionuclide elements present in the waste and the non-radioactive components added during reprocessing and pretreatment. The crichtonite structure (AM21O38 and A2M19O36), based on crystallo-chemical considerations and natural compositional analogues, may effectively incorporate both fission products and actinides. The naturally occurring crichtonite structure types include Sr (crichtonite), Ca and REE (loveringite), Na (landauite), REE and U (davidite), K (mathiasite), Ba (lindsleyite), and Pb (senaite), which are classified based on the dominant, large cations occupying the A-site. The crystal structure contains three types of sites of distinct size, from very large, M0, intermediate (M1, M3, M4, and M5), to small (M2). Numerous coupled substitutions within these cation sites allow for charge balance. Synthesis experiments were completed on the Ba-, Sr-, Ca-, and K-member compositions at 3 GPa and 1,150 °C. Low pressure synthesis should be possible, as natural minerals mostly occur in low-P systems. Reaction products were characterized by powder x-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy and electron microprobe analysis. In addition to the crichtonite phases, rutile, spinel, perovskite and armalcolite were identified as well. The Crichtonite structure type is estimated to accommodate waste loading of up to 30 wt. % PW-4B waste.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 353: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII , 1994 , 807
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C., In Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, New York, 1988), p. 699.Google Scholar
2. Ewing, R.C. and Lutze, W., Ceramics International 17, 287 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Ringwood, A.E., Kesson, S.E., Reeve, K.D., Levins, D.M., Ramm, E.J., In Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by Lutze, W. and Ewing, R.C. (North-Holland, New York, 1988), p. 235.Google Scholar
4. Harker, A.B., Flintoff, J.F., In Advances in Ceramics. Vol. 8, edited by Wicks, G.G. and Ross, W.A. (America Ceramics Society, Columbia, 1984), p. 222. A.B. Harker, in Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future, edited by W. Lutze and R.C. Ewing (North-Holland, New York, 1988), p. 335.Google Scholar
5. Grey, J.E., Lloyd, D.J., White, J.S. Jr., Am. Miner. 61, 1203 (1976).Google Scholar
6. Haggerty, S.E., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 47, 1833 (1983).Google Scholar
7. Sarp, H., Bertrand, J., Deferne, J., Liebich, B.W., N. Jb. Miner. Mh. 10, 433 (1981).Google Scholar
8. Stalder von, H.A. and Bühler, Ch., Schweiz. Mineral. Petrogr. Mitt. 67, 63 (1987).Google Scholar
9. Gatehouse, B.M., Grey, J.E., Kelly, P.R., Am. Miner. 64, 1010 (1979).Google Scholar
10. Gatehouse, B.M., Grey, J.E., Campbell, I.H., Kelly, P.R., Am. Miner. 63, 28 (1978).Google Scholar
11. Campbell, I.H. and Kelly, P.R., Miner. Mag. 42, 187 (1978).Google Scholar
12. Foord, E.E., Sharp, W.N., Adams, J.W., Miner. Mag. 48, 97 (1984).Google Scholar
13. Shannon, R.D., Acta Crystallgr. A32, 751 (1976).Google Scholar
14. Lloyd, E.C., Accurate Characterization of the High Pressure Environment, NBS Special Publication No. 326, Washington D.C., p. 1 (1971).Google Scholar
15. Xie, H.S., et al., Earth Interior’s Materials Researches, Special Publication of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing (1990).Google Scholar
16. Haggerty, S.E., Smyth, J.R., Erlank, A.J., Richard, R.S., Danchin, R.V., Am. Miner. 68: 494 (1983).Google Scholar
17. Liu, J.S., Guan, Y.X., Liu, X.G., Xa, X., Acta Miner. Sinica 10, 221 (1990).Google Scholar
18. Larsen, A., Norsk. Geol. Tidssk. 69, 235 (1989).Google Scholar
19 Bulter, J.R. and Hall, R., Economic Geol. 55, 1541 (1960).Google Scholar
20. Mossman, D.J., Can. Miner. 23, 495 (1985).Google Scholar
21. Rouse, R.C. and Peacor, D.R., Am. Miner. 53, 869 (1968).Google Scholar