Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-zzh7m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T12:43:28.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Depth Profiles of High-energy Recoil Implantation of Boron into Silicon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Lin Shao
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Xinming Lu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Jianyue Jin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Qinmian Li
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Irene Rusakova
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Jiarui Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Wei-Kan Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, and Texas Center for Superconductivity, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5932
Get access

Abstract

We have studied boron profiles by using the ion beam recoil implantation. A boron layer was first deposited onto Si, followed by irradiation with Si ions at various energies to knock the boron. Conventional belief is that the higher the implantation energy, the deeper the recoil profiles. While this is true for low-energy incident ions, we show here that the situation is reversed for incident Si ions of higher energy due to the fact that recoil probability at a given angle is a strong function of the energy of the primary projectile. Our experiments show that 500-keV high-energy recoil implantation produces a shallower B profile than lower-energy implantation such as 10 keV and 50 keV. The secondary-ion-massspectrometry (SIMS) analysis shows that the distribution of recoiled B atoms scattered by the energetic Si ions agrees with our calculation results. Sub-100 nm p+/n junctions have been realized with a 500-keV Si ion beam.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bruel, M., Floccari, M., and Gailliard, J. P., Nucl. Instr. and Methods Phys. Res. B 182/183, 93(1981)10.1016/0029-554X(81)90675-3Google Scholar
2 Grob, A., Grob, J. J., Mesli, N., Salles, D., and Siffert, P., Nucl. Instr. and Methods Phys. Res. B 182/183, 85(1981)10.1016/0029-554X(81)90674-1Google Scholar
3 Liu, H. L., Gearhart, S. S., Booske, J. H., and Wang, W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16(1), 415 (1998)10.1116/1.589823Google Scholar
4 Christel, L. A., Gibbons, J. F., and Mylroie, S., Nucl. Instr. and Methods Phys. Res. B 182/183 (1981) 187198 10.1016/0029-554X(81)90687-XGoogle Scholar
5 Wilson, W. D., Haagmark, L. G. and Biersack, J. P., Phys. Rev. B. 15(1977) 2458.10.1103/PhysRevB.15.2458Google Scholar
6 Lindhard, J., Nielsen, V., and Scharff, M., Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 36 (10) (1968)Google Scholar
7 Lindhard, J., Scharff, M. and Schiott, H. E., Mat. Fys. Medd. Dan. Vid. Selsk. 33 (14) (1963)Google Scholar
8 Biersack, J. and Haggmark, L.G., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 174, 257 (1980)10.1016/0029-554X(80)90440-1Google Scholar
9 Ganin, E., Davari, B., Harame, D., Scilla, G. and Sai-Halasz, G.A., Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. vol. 128, Pittsburgh, PA (1989)Google Scholar