Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-23T08:42:16.828Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Determination of Relative Number Densities and Quenching Rates of Sodium in an Atmospheric Flame by Asynchronous Optical Sampling

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

Gregory J. Fiechtner
Affiliation:
Flame Diagnostics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Yanan Jiang
Affiliation:
Visiting Professor, Tshinghua University, Beijing, China
Galen B. King
Affiliation:
Flame Diagnostics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Normand M. Laurendeau
Affiliation:
Flame Diagnostics Laboratory, School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Fred E. Lytle
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907
Get access

Extract

Pump/probe methods are commonly employed to measure subnanosecond excited state processes in liquid and gas phase systems. Asynchronous Optical Sampling (ASOPS) is a newly-developed pump/probe method that will potentially allow the determination of number densities and relaxation rates in turbulent, high-pressure flames. In addition, ASOPS should yield a better signal-to-noise ratio than laser-induced fluorescence in practical combustion environments. The ASOPS method utilizes a coherent, signal-carrying beam and thus requires no more optical access than LDV measurements. The current ASOPS instrument consists of two dye lasers synchronously pumped by two frequency-doubled, mode-locked Nd:YAG lasers. The two lasers operate at slightly different repetition rates, causing a relative phase walk-out between the pump and probe beams. This strategy allows the mapping of subnanosecond excitation processes in a time scale on the order of milliseconds.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Fleming, G. R., Adv. Chem. Phys. 49, 1 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Lytle, F. E., Parrish, R. M., and Barnes, W. T., Appl. Spectrosc. 39, 444 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Elzinga, P. A., Lytle, F. E., Jiang, Y., King, G. B., and Laurendeau, N. M., Appl. Spectrosc. 41, 2 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Elzinga, P. A., Kneisler, R. J., Lytle, F. E., Jiang, Y., King, G. B., and Laurendeau, N. M., Appl. Opt. 26, 4303 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Blanchard, G. J. and Wirth, M. J., Anal. Chem. 58, 532 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Quitevis, E. L., Templeton, E. F. Gudgin, and Kenney-Wallace, G. A., Appl. Opt. 24, 318 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Andor, L., Lorincz, A., Siemion, J., Smith, D. D., and Rice, S. A., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 55, 64 (1984).Google Scholar
8. Bado, P., Wilson, S. B., and Wilson, K. R., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 53, 706 (1982).Google Scholar
9. Alfano, A. J., Fong, F. K., and Lytle, F. E., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 54, 967 (1983).Google Scholar
10. Kneisler, R. J., Lytle, F. E., Fiechtner, G. J., Jiang, Y., King, G. B., and Laurendeau, N. M., “Asynchronous Optical Sampling: A New Combustion Diagnostic for Potential Use in Turbulent, High Pressure Flames”, submitted for publication.Google Scholar
11. Harris, J. M., Lytle, F. E., and McCain, T. C., Anal. Chem. 48, 2095 (1976).Google Scholar
12. Alkemade, C. Th. J., Hollander, Tj., Snelleman, W., and Zeegers, P. J. Th., Metal Vapours in Flames, Pergamon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
13. Takubo, Y., Okamoto, T., and Yamamoto, M., Appl. Opt. 25, 740 (1986).Google Scholar