Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-c75p9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-09-02T01:19:15.661Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control of Grain Boundary Microstructures in Liquid-Phase Sintered Alumina

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

N. Ravishankar  and
C. Barry Carter
N. Ravishankar
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455–01432
C. Barry Carter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, 421 Washington Ave SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455–01432
Get access

Abstract

The elimination of the grain boundary liquid in liquid-phase sintered materials is examined for the case of anorthite liquid in alumina grain boundaries. It is shown that under suitable conditions the liquid can exude from the grain boundary to the free surface. The proposed driving force is provided by the difference in energies and wetting behavior of the grain boundary and the free surface at high temperatures. The results emphasize the importance of the crystallography of the boundary and the nature of free surfaces (i.e., the surface energies) on the exudation behavior.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 586: Symposium M – Interfacial Engineering for Optimized Properties II , 1999 , 59
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Clarke, D.R., Ann. Rev. Mater. Sci. 17, pp. 57–74 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Clarke, D.R. in Intergranular Phases in Pohvcrsttalline Ceramics, edited by Dufour, L.-C., Monty, C., and Petot-Ervas, G. (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 57–79.Google Scholar
3. Cinnibulk, M.K., Kleebe, H.-., Schneider, G.A., and Ruhle, M., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 76, pp. 2801–808 (1993).Google Scholar
4. Mallamaci, M.P., Carter, C.B. and Bentley, J., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 321, pp. 567–572 Google Scholar
5. Mallamaci, M.P. and Carter, C.B., J.Am. Ceram. Soc. 82, pp. 33–42 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Raj, R. and Lange, F.F., Acta Metall. 29, pp. 1993–2000 (1981).Google Scholar
7. Ramamurthy, S., Hebert, B.C., and Carter, C.B., Phil. Mag. Lett. 72, pp. 269–75 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Ramamurthy, S., Hebert, B.C., Carter, C.B. and Schmalzried, H., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 398, pp. 295–300 Google Scholar
9. Ramamurthy, S., Carter, C.B. and Schmalzried, H., Accepted for publication Phil. Mag. A.Google Scholar
10. Ravishankar, N. and Carter, C.B. in Migration of Silicate Liquids out of Grain Boundaries in Ceeramics, edited by (Microscopy and Microanalysis ‘99 Springer, Portland, OR, pp. 800–801.Google Scholar
11. Suznitsky, D.W. and Carter, C.B., J.Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, pp. 2485–2493 (1990).Google Scholar
12. Brada, M.P. and Clarke, D.R., Acta Mater. 45, pp. 2501–2508 (1997).Google Scholar