Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-11T22:58:08.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ductile Phase Toughening of Brittle Intermetallics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

D. L. Anton  and
D. M. Shah
D. L. Anton
Affiliation:
United Technologies Research Center
D. M. Shah
Affiliation:
Pratt & Whitney, East Hartford, CT 06108
Get access

Abstract

One method of imparting damage tolerance into intermetallic compounds is to introduce ductile particles in a fine uniform distribution. Systematic criteria are given as to the necessary requirements for such ductile phase reinforced systems. Two composite systems, Cr2Nb/Nb and Nb3Al/Nb were selected for further evaluation. Both microstructural evaluations as well as thermal stability were demonstrated in both systems. Small cracks introduced via micro-hardness indentations were measured as a function of precipitate size. In Cr2Nb/Nb the crack lengths decreased with increasing particle size which was explained through increasing effectiveness of ductile particles with minimum effective particle radii calculated at 6-10 μm. Larger particles along with poor ductile phase distributions led to lower damage tolerance in aged Nb3Al/Nb. By maintaining uniform ductile particle distributions, intermetallic compounds possessing superior damage tolerance have been demonstrated.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 194: Symposium R – Intermetallic Matrix Composites I , 1990 , 45
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Kuntz-Douglass, S., Beaumont, P. W. R., and Ashby, M. F., J. Mater. Sci., 15, 1109 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Bucknall, C. B., Toughened Plastics, Applied Science Pub., London, U.K., 1977.Google Scholar
3. Leuther, R. C., Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Bradt, R. C. et. al. eds., vol.2, Plenum Press, New York, USA, (1974).Google Scholar
4. Anton, D. L., Shah, D. M., Duhl, D. N. and Giamei, A. F., JOM, 41, 12 (1989).Google Scholar
5. Anton, D. L. and Shah, D. M., in High Temperature Structural Intermetallic Compounds, Liu, C. T. et. al. eds., MRS, Pittsburgh, PA, (1989).Google Scholar
6. Handbook of Binary Phase Diagrams, ASM International, Metals Park, Ohio, 1987.Google Scholar
7. Lundin, C. E. and Yamaoto, A. S., Met. Trans. Soc. AIME, 236, 863 (1966)Google Scholar
8. Kohot, L., Horyn, R. and Iliev, N., J. Less Common Mets., 44, 215 (1976).Google Scholar
9. Jorda, L., Flukinger, R. and Muller, J., J. Less Common Mets., 75, 227 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Shah, D. M. and Anton, D. L., ”Development Potential of Advanced Intermetallic Materials”, Quarterly Rpt. April 1987, AFML Contract F33615–87–C-5214.Google Scholar
11. Marieb, T., ”A TEM Investigation of the Nb/.Nb3Al System Deformed at Elevated Temperatures”, Masters Thesis, Brown University (1989).Google Scholar