Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-15T12:13:31.471Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamics of InAs Quantum Dots Formation on AlAs and GaAs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

M. Yakimov
Affiliation:
UAlbany Institute for Materials, University at Albany - SUNY, CESTM, 251 Fuller Rd., Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
V. Tokranov
Affiliation:
UAlbany Institute for Materials, University at Albany - SUNY, CESTM, 251 Fuller Rd., Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
S. Oktyabrsky
Affiliation:
UAlbany Institute for Materials, University at Albany - SUNY, CESTM, 251 Fuller Rd., Albany, NY 12203, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We have studied the formation of InAs quantum dots (QDs) grown by molecular beam epitaxy on top of GaAs and 2 ML-thick AlAs layers in the temperature range from 350 to 500°C. In-situ reflection high energy electron diffraction (RHEED) patterns were recorded in real time during the growth and analyzed to characterize the 2D-to-3D transition on the surface, including QD formation, and ripening process. The kinetics of QD formation was studied using the InAs growth rates ranging from 0.01 to 1 ML/s and different ratios of As2/In fluxes. RHEED patterns and ex-situ atomic force microscopy images were analyzed to reveal the development of sizes and shapes of the single-layer and stacked QD ensembles. The critical InAs coverage for QD formation was shown to be consistently higher for dots grown on the AlAs overlayer than for those grown on GaAs surface. Self-assembly of multilayer QD stacks revealed the reduction of the critical thickness for dots formed in the upper layers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Bimberg, D., Grundmann, M., Heinrichsdorff, F., et al., Thin Solid Films, 367, 235 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Kissel, H., Müller, U., Walther, C., Masselink, W. T., Mazur, Y. I., Tarasov, G. G., and Lisitsa, M.P., Phys. Rev. B, 62, 7213 (2000).Google Scholar
3 Wohlert, D. E., Cheng, K. Y., Chang, K. L., and Hsieh, K. C., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. B, 17, 1120 (1999).Google Scholar
4 Zhukov, A. E., Ustinov, V. M., Kovsh, A. R., et al., Semicon. Sci. Tech., 14, 575 (1999).Google Scholar
5 Koike, K., Ohkawa, H., and Yano, M., Jap. J. Appl. Phys.,-Part 2 (Letters), 38, L417 (1999).Google Scholar
6 Hao, L., Webb, R. Lowe, Weidong, Y., and Sercel, P. C., Appl. Phys. Lett., 72, 812 (1998).Google Scholar
7 Rouvimov, S., Weber, Z. Liliental, Swider, W., et al., J. Electron. Mat., 27, 427 (1998).Google Scholar