Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T18:58:33.072Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of in and Out of Plane Stresses During Indentation of Diamond Films on Metal Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

D. F. Bahr  and
W. W. Gerberich
D. F. Bahr
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
W. W. Gerberich
Affiliation:
Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455
Get access

Abstract

Diamond films grown on molybdenum substrates are indented with conical diamond indenters to depths more than 5 times the thickness of the film. This causes delamination and spalling of the film. The effects of variations in indenter angle and film thickness are demonstrated. Using a radius of the delaminated area to the residual contact radius, sharper indenters are shown to cause a 10 to 20% change in that ratio. For films greater than 5 μm thick, there is no apparent film thickness effect. Possibilities for this observation are cracking due to bending stresses or the interfacial crack kinking out of the interface due to a reduction in compressive stresses, leading to mixed mode loading. The strain energy release rate of the interface for an 800 nm diamond film on molybdenum is between 2.4 and 7 J/m2.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 436: Symposium CC – Thin Films Stresses and Mechanical Properties VI , 1996 , 85
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Yarbrough, W. A.,, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 75, p. 3179 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Sung, C.P., Shih, H.C., J. Mater. Res., 7, p. 105 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Kuo, C.T., Yen, T.Y., Huang, T.H., Hsu, S.E., J. Mater. Res., 5, p. 2515 (1990).Google Scholar
4. McCune, R.C., Chase, R.E., Cartwright, E.L., Surf. Coat. Tech., 53, p. 189 (1992).Google Scholar
5. Drory, M.D., Huthcinson, J.W., Science, 263, p. 1753 (1994).Google Scholar
6. Dugdale, D.S., J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 2, p. 265 (1954).Google Scholar
7. Bahr, D.F., Gerberich, W.W., submitted to Met. Trans. A. (1995).Google Scholar
8. Lu, Z.P., Heberlein, J., Pfender, E., Plasma Chem. Plasma Process., 12, p. 35 (1992)Google Scholar
9. Hoehn, J.W., Bahr, D.F., Heberlein, J., Pfender, E., Gerberich, W.W., in Mechanical Behavior of Diamond and Other Forms of Carbon, ed. Drory, M.D., Bogy, D.B., Donley, M.S., Field, J.E. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 383, Pittsburgh, PA 1996).Google Scholar
10. Drory, M.D., Hutchinson, J.W., ”Measurment of the adheison of a brittle film on a ductile substrate by indentation”, submitted to Proc. Roy. Soc. (1995).Google Scholar
11. Nash, W.A., in ASME Handbook, Metals Engineering Design, ed. Horger, O.J., Mc Graw Hill, New York, 1951, pp. 174–177.Google Scholar
12. Drory, M.D., Dauskardt, R.H., Kant, A., Ritchie, R.O., J. Appl. Phys., 78, p. 3083 (1995).Google Scholar
13. Bahr, D.F., Bucci, D.V., Schadler, L.S., Last, J.A., Heberlein, J., Pfender, E., Gerberich, W.W., submitted to Dia. Rel. Mater., (1996).Google Scholar