Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T01:05:19.409Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effect of Si and P on the Formation and Crystallization of Ti25Hf50Ni25 Metallic Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

V. T. Huett  and
K. F. Kelton
V. T. Huett
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, U.S.A.
K. F. Kelton
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO 63130, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Ti255Hf50Ni25 metallic glasses, prepared by rapid quenching, are strongly metastable with a 65°C separation between the glass transition temperature, Tg = 335°C, and the onset temperature for primary crystallization. The deep metastability of the glass is likely due to sluggish nucleation and growth kinetics, limited by the Hf diffusion. The glass crystallizes to a nano-scale microstructure consisting of an icosahedrally symmetric ordered phase. This phase is metastable and transforms to a stable Ti2Ni-type phase with annealing at higher temperatures. The primary crystallization to a metastable icosahedrally-ordered phase suggests that the local structure of the glass contains a high degree of icosahedral short-range order. Here, glass formation and crystallization were studied in alloys containing 2 at.% of Si and P.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 754: Symposium CC – Supercooled Liquids, Glass Transition and Bulk Metallic Glasses , 2002 , CC10.9
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Wilde, G., Görler, G.P., Willnecker, R. and Dietz, G., Appl. Phys. Lett., 65, 397 (1994).Google Scholar
2. Fecht, H. J., Phil. Mag. B., 76, 495 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Meyer, A., Wuttke, J., Petry, W., Randl, O. G. and Schober, H., Phys. Rev. Lett., 80., 4454 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Busch, R., Liu, W. and Johnson, W. L., J. Appl. Phys., 83, 4134 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Croat, T. K. and Kelton, K. F., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc, 481, 137 (1997).Google Scholar
6. Nelson, D. R. and Spaepen, F., in Solid State Physics, edited by Ehrenreich, H. and Turnbull, D. (Academic, Boston, 1989), vol. 42, p. 1.Google Scholar
7. Holzer, J. C. and Kelton, K. F., Acta Matall. Mater., 39, 1833 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Holzer, J. C. and Kelton, K. F. in Crystal-Quasicrystal Transitions, edited by Yacaman, M. J. and Torres, M. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1993), p. 103.Google Scholar
9. Holland-Moritz, D., Herlach, D. M. and Urban, K., Phys. Rev. Lett., 71, 1196 (1993).Google Scholar
10. Huett, V. T. and Kelton, K. F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 81, 1026 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Huett, V. T. and Kelton, K. F., Phil. Mag. Lett., 82, 191 (2003).Google Scholar