Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T15:41:08.756Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Ribbon Thickness and Annealing Temperature on the AC Magnetic Properties of the Fe81.5B14.5Si3C1 Alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

S.C. Ihiuangp
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York, USA
G. Frischmann
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York, USA
F.E. Luborsky
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York, USA
J.D. Livingston
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York, USA
A. Mogro-Campero
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York, USA
Get access

Abstract

The a.c. magnetic properties measured at 60 Hz are found to be strongly affected by ribbon thickness and annealing temperature. These magnetic results are further characterized by observations on magnetic domain structure, crystallization, stress relaxation, and ribbon surface finish.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Luborsky, F.E., Liebermann, H.H. and Walter, J.L., Proc. Conf. Metallic Glasses,June 3–4, 1980, published by org. comm., Central Res. Inst. Phys., Budapest, Hungary, p. 203.Google Scholar
2.Takayama, S. and Oi, T., J. Appl. Phys., 50 (1979), p. 1595.10.1063/1.327252Google Scholar
3.Novak, L., Potocky, L., Lovas, A., Kisdi-Koszo, E. and Takacs, J., J. Magn. and Magn. Mat., 19 (1980), p. 149.10.1016/0304-8853(80)90579-XGoogle Scholar
4.Huang, S.C., to be presented at the 4thInternational Conf. on Rapidly Quenched Metals,Sendai, Japan,August 1981.Google Scholar
5.Huang, S.C. and Fiedler, H.C., Met. Trans., 12A (1981), p. 1107.10.1007/BF02643492Google Scholar
6.Livingston, J.D. and Morris, W.G., IEEE Trans. Magn., MAG17 (1981), to appear.10.1109/TMAG.1981.1061525Google Scholar
7.Luborsky, F.E. and Walter, J.L., Mat. Sci. Eng., 35 (1978), p. 255.10.1016/0025-5416(78)90127-1Google Scholar
8.Mogro-Campero, A. and Walter, J.L., J. Phys., 41 (1980), p. C8497.Google Scholar
9.Taub, A.I. and Spaepen, F., Acta Met., 28 (1980), p. 1781.10.1016/0001-6160(80)90031-0Google Scholar
10.Patterson, J.P. and Jones, D.R.H., Acta Met., 28 (1980), p. 675.10.1016/0001-6160(80)90145-5Google Scholar