Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-cfpbc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T03:30:21.948Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Superimposed Pressure on Flow and Fracture of Two Bulk Amorphous Metals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Paul Wesseling
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U.S.A.
Peravudh Lowhahphandu
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U.S.A.
John J. Lewandowski
Affiliation:
Case Western Reserve University, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Tension and compression tests have been performed with high alignment fixtures on two different zirconium-based bulk metallic glass specimens at atmospheric pressure as well as with levels of superimposed hydrostatic pressure up to 700 MPa. The results show essentially no difference in applied flow stress or fracture stress between compression and tension specimens over the range of pressures tested. However, a difference in fracture plane angle between compression and tension specimens was observed, suggesting a normal stress effect, as in granular solids, on the flow and fracture behavior of the bulk metallic glass specimens. The data are compared to various flow and fracture theories over a very wide range of normal stresses. Over the range tested, a Mohr-Coulomb flow theory appears to best describe the data.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Bridgman, P.W., Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci. 47, 347 (1911).Google Scholar
[2] Bridgman, P.W., Studies in Large Plastic Flow and Fracture (McGraw-Hill, 1952).Google Scholar
[3] Lewandowski, J.J., Lowhaphandu, P., Int. Mater. Rev. 43, 143 (1998).Google Scholar
[4] Lowhaphandu, P., Montgomery, S.L., Lewandowski, J.J., Scripta Metall. 41, 19 (1999).Google Scholar
[5] Lowhaphandu, P., Ludrosky, L.A., Montgomery, S.L., Lewandowski, J.J., Intermetallics 8, 487 (2000).Google Scholar
[6] Lewandowski, J.J., Lowhaphandu, P., Phil. Mag. A 82 (17), 3427 (2003).Google Scholar
[7] Lewandowski, J.J., Wesseling, P., Prabhu, N.S., Larose, J., Lerch, B.A., Metall. and Mater. Trans. A, in press (2003).Google Scholar
[8] Davis, L.A., Kavesh, S., J. Mater. Sci. 10, 453 (1975).Google Scholar
[9] Sigley, R.H., Wronski, A.S., Parry, T.V., J. Mater. Sci. 26, 3985 (1991).Google Scholar
[10] Habib, P., Solid and Rock Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 1985).Google Scholar
[11] Schofield, A.N., Wroth, C.P., Critical State Soil Mechanics(McGraw-Hill, 1968).Google Scholar
[12] Spaepen, F., Acta Metall. 25, 407 (1977).Google Scholar
[13] Argon, A.S., Acta Metall. 27, 47 (1979)Google Scholar