Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-mp689 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T02:47:52.469Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron Emission Properties of Diamond and III-V Nitrides

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

R. J. Nemanich
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
P.K. Baumann
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
M.J. Benjamin
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
S.L. English
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
J.D. Hartman
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
A.T. Sowers
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
B.L. Ward
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
P.C. Yang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics and Department of Materials Science and EngineeringNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8202
Get access

Abstract

Wide bandgap semiconductors such as diamond and the III-V nitrides of GaN and AIN exhibit small or even negative electron affinities. Recent results have shown that surface treatments will modify the electron affinity of diamond to cause a negative electron affinity (NEA). Results are presented which correlate the field emission from single crystal p-type (boron doped) diamond with the electron affinity of the surfaces. The field emission is explored for nitrogen doped polycrystalline films. The threshold for field emission is significantly higher than from p-type diamond, and in fact, most surfaces are severely damaged during the emission measurement. High resolution photo-electron emission microscopy (PEEM) and field emission electron microscopy (FEEM) are employed to determine the relation of the emission to the surface morphology. PEEM results presented for diamond indicate relatively uniform emission with increased intensity at protruding crystallite edges. Results are presented for cold cathodes fabricated from epitaxial nitrides grown on 6H-SiC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Himpsel, F.J., Knapp, J.A., van Vechten, J.A., Eastman, D.E., Phys. Rev. B 20, 624 (1979).Google Scholar
2 Pate, B.B., Surf. Sci. 165, 83 (1986).Google Scholar
3 Weide, J. van der and Nemanich, R.J., Phys. Rev. B, 49 (1994) 13629.Google Scholar
4 Benjamin, M. C., Wang, C., Davis, R. F., and Nemanich, R. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 64, 3288 (1994).Google Scholar
5 Benjamin, M.C., Bremser, M.D., Weeks, T.W. Jr., King, S.W., Davis, R.F., and Nemanich, R.J.. Applied Surface Science 104/105, 455 (1996)Google Scholar
6 Nemanich, R.J., Benjamin, M.C., King, S.W., Bremser, M.D., Davis, R.F., Chen, B., Zhang, Z., and Bernholc, J.. Gallium Nitride and Related Materials, edited by Ponce, F.A., Dupuis, R.D., Nakamura, S. and Edmond, J.A.. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol 395, 1995) pp 777788.Google Scholar
7 Baumann, P.K. and Nemanich, R.J., Surface Science, (in press).Google Scholar
8 Bandis, C. and Pate, B.B., Appl. Phys. Lett. 69, 366 (1996).Google Scholar
9 Geis, M.W., Twichell, J.C., Macaulay, J., and Okano, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67, 1328 (1995).Google Scholar
10 Kuttel, O.M., Groning, O, Schaller, E., Diedrich, L., Groning, P. and Schlapbach, L., Diamond and Related Mater. 5, 807 (1996).Google Scholar
11 Nam, O.-H., Bremser, M.D., Ward, B.L., Nemanich, R.J., and Davis, R.F., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, L532 (1997).Google Scholar
12 Wang, C. Garcia, A. Ingram, D.C. Lake, M., Kordesch, M.E., Electronic Lett. 27, 1459 (1993)Google Scholar
13 Shovlin, J.D., Kordesch, M.E., Appl. Phys. Letters 65, 863 (1994)Google Scholar
14 Shovlin, J.D., Kordesch, M.E., Dunham, D., Toner, B.P., Engel, W., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 13, 1111 (1995).Google Scholar
15 Sowers, A.T., Christman, J.A., Bremser, M.D., Ward, B.L., Davis, R.F., and Nemanich, R.J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 2289 (1997).Google Scholar
16 King, S. W., Smith, L. L., Bamak, J. P., Ku, J., Christman, J. A., Benjamin, M. C., Bremser, M. D., Nemanich, R. J., and Davis, R. F., in GaN and Related Materials edited by Ponce, F. A., Dupuis, R. D., Nakamura, S., and Edmond, J. A. (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 395, Pittsburgh, PA, 1996) pp. 739744 Google Scholar