Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T06:17:53.393Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electrostatic Potentials at θ = 24° [001] Tilt Boundaries in Undoped and Doped Strontium Titanate Bicrystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Z. Mao
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, U.K.
R. E. Dunin-Borkowski
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, U.K.
C. B. Boothroyd
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, U.K.
K. M. Knowles
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Metallurgy, University of Cambridge, Pembroke Street, Cambridge CB2 3QZ, U.K.
Get access

Abstract

Phase contrast techniques in the transmission electron microscope are used to measure directly the electrostatic potentials at θ = 24° [001] symmetrical tilt grain boundaries in both undoped and Nb-doped SrTiO3 bicrystals. The boundaries are all found to have significantly lower scattering potentials than the surrounding bulk material. The depths and the shapes of the potential wells at the boundaries are discussed in the light of both theoretical models of the grain boundary chemistry of pure and doped strontium titanate and other experimental data that we have acquired on these boundaries from high resolution transmission electron microscopy, diffuse dark field imaging, energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy and electron energy loss spectroscopy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chiang, Y.-M. and Takagi, T., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73, 3278 (1990).Google Scholar
2. Desu, S.B. and Payne, D.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 73, 3391 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Tonomura, A., Advances in Physics, 41, 59 (1992).Google Scholar
4. Ross, F.M. and Stobbs, W.M., Phil. Mag. A, 63, 1 (1991); Phil. Mag. A, 63, 37 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Ravikumar, V., Rodrigues, R.P. and Dravid, V.P., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys., 29, 1799 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Mao, Z. and Knowles, K.M., Electroceramics V, Aveiro, Portugal, Proceedings: Vol. 2, 533 (1996).Google Scholar
7. Mao, Z., Dunin-Borkowski, R.E., Boothroyd, C.B. and Knowles, K.M., in preparation.Google Scholar
8. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A. and Vetterling, W.T., Numerical Recipes (Cambridge University Press, 1989).Google Scholar
9. Dunin-Borkowski, R.E., Saxton, W.O. and Stobbs, W.M., Acta Crystallographica A, 52, 705 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Rosenberg, H.M., The Solid State (Oxford University Press, 1986), p. 163.Google Scholar
11. Kliewer, K.L. and Koehler, J.S., Physical Review A, 140, 1226 (1965).Google Scholar