Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vfjqv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T16:58:12.827Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancing Mechanical Properties of Polymer Composites by Modification of Surface Acidity or Basicity of Fillers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

F. M. Fowkes ,
D. W. Dwight ,
J. A. Manson ,
T. B. Lloyd ,
D. O. Tischler  and
B. A. Shah
F. M. Fowkes
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
D. W. Dwight
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
J. A. Manson
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
T. B. Lloyd
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
D. O. Tischler
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
B. A. Shah
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015
Get access

Abstract

The surface of a powdered glass has been treated to optimize its performance as a filler in polymer composites cast from solution. The aim has been to enhance acid-base interactions between the functional sites of polymers and the surface sites of the glass particles so as to insure complete coverage of the glass particles by adsorbed polymer molecules, and to thereby enhance both the adhesion and dispersion of the filler. The glass chosen for this study is a magnesium aluminum silicate of very low alkali metal content, and its surface sites have negligible basicity and only moderate acidity, as evidenced by weak adsorption of polymethylmethacrylate and negligible adsorption of chlorinated polyvinylchloride from solution in methylene chloride. Because of the negligible surface basicity of the filler, acidic polymers such as polyvinylbutyral and polyvinyl chloride are not adsorbed sufficiently to promote adhesion or dispersibility, and brittle or weak composites result.

Surface treatments to enhance surface acidity or basicity of the glass particles were evaluated by electrophoresis in organic solvents, in which acidic particles had negative zeta-potentials and basic particles had positive zeta-potentials; untreated glass particles had zero zetapotentials. The most effective treatments were done with silane coupling agents; amino-silanes provided strong negative zeta-potentials and methacryloxy-silanes provided strong positive zeta-potentials. Angleresolved ESCA spectra showed that the adsorbed amino-silanes averaged about a monolayer in thickness and that half of the nitrogens bonded to the surface as ammonium groups and half were in the outer surface as basic amine groups; the carbonyl oxygens of the methacryloxy-silanes appeared to be bonded to the surface.

Heavily-loaded polymer composites were made with the silane-treated and with untreated glass powders, using two acidic binders and a basic binder. The acidic binders were a polyvinylbutyral (PVB) binder cast from solution in a methanol-MIBK mixture, and a post-chlorinated polyvinylchloride (CPVC) binder cast from solution in a mixture of cyclohexane and tetrahydrofuran (THF): the glass transition temperature (Tg) for CPVC is about 140 C, but for PVB it is only about 35 C. The basic polymer (PEHM, polyethyl-hexylmethacrylate) has a Tg well below room temperature. Thus the extension to break in tensile tests was about 1% for CPVC, 10% for PVB, and 20 % for PEHM. About ten stress-strain Instron tests were made on each composite, and the composites with appreciable acid-base interactions between the matrix polymer and the surface sites of the treated glass fillers were in all cases much tougher than those without such acid-base interactions. The brittleness of the polyvinylbutyral composites filled with untreated glass powders was not observed at all on silane-treated glass powders.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 119: Symposium F – Adhesions in Solids , 1988 , 223
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.- Gent, A. and Schultz, J., J. Adhesion 3, 281 (1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.- Andrews, E. H. and Kinloch, A. J., Proc. Roy. Soc. A 332, 385 (1973)Google Scholar
3.- Maugis, D., J. Mater. Sci. Letters 5, 679 (1986)Google Scholar
4.- Fowkes, F. M. and Mostafa, M. A., IEC Prod R&D 17, 3 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.- Marmo, M., Jinnai, H., Mostafa, M. A., Fowkes, F. M. and Manson, J. A., TEC Prod R&D 15, 206 (1976).Google Scholar
6.- Tirrell, M. and Habziioannou, G., Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. 84, 4725 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.- Pugh, R. J., Matsunaga, T. and Fowkes, F. M., Colloids and Surfaces, 7, 183 (1983).Google Scholar
8.- Pugh, R. J. and Fowkes, F. M., Colloids and Surfaces, 9, 33 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.- Fowkes, F. M. and Pugh, R. J., ACS Symposium Series 240, ed. Goddard, and Vincent, , p. 331 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1O.-Fowkes, F. M., Jinnai, H., Mostafa, M. A., Anderson, F. W. and Moore, R. J., ACS Symposium Series 200, edited by Hair, M. and Croucher, M., p 307 (1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.-Kulkarni, R. D. and Goddard, E. G., 35th Ann. Conf. RP/CI, Paper 20-F (1980).Google Scholar
12.-Fowkes, F. M., Jones, K. L., Li, G. and Lloyd, T. B., submitted for publication in Energy and Fuels (1988)Google Scholar
13.-Drago, R. S., Vogel, G.C and Needham, T. R., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 93, 6014 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.-Fowkes, F. M., Tischler, D. O., Wolfe, J. A., Lannigan, L. A., Ademu-John, C. M. and Halliwell, M. J., J. Poly Sci., Poly. Chem. Ed., 22, 547 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.-Fowkes, F. M., McCarthy, D. C. and Tischler, D. O., in Molecular Characterization of Composite Interfaces, ed. by Ishida, H. and Kumar, G. (Plenum Press, New York, 1985) p. 4 0 1Google Scholar
16.-Fadley, C. S., J. Electron Spectrosc. 5, 725 (1974)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.-Fadley, C. S., Prog. Solid State Chem. 11, 265 (1976)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.-Ishida, H., Naviroj, S. and Koenig, J. L., in Physicochemical Aspects of Polymer Surfaces, ed. by Mittal, K. (Plenum Press, New York 1983), p.91.Google Scholar