Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T14:58:54.459Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluation of the Vapor and Chemical Sensing Mechanism for Pentacene Field Effect Transistors

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Davianne A Duarte
Affiliation:
davianned@gmail.com
Deepak Sharma
Affiliation:
itisds@gmail.com, University of Texas at Austin, Electrical and computer engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
Brian Cobb
Affiliation:
bcobb@gmail.com, University of Texas at Austin, Electrical and computer engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
Ananth Dodabalapur
Affiliation:
ananth.dodabalapur@engr.utexas.edu, University of Texas at Austin, Electrical and computer engineering, Austin, Texas, United States
Get access

Abstract

Properties such as semicondutor film grain size, morphology, and channel length are known to effect the sensing response in pentacene based organic thin film transistors (OTFTs). The sensing behavior for low and high mobility pentacene devices are reported here exhibiting different temperature dependent behaviors. The lower mobility OTFT exhibits an expected thermally activated response during alcohol testing with an increasing mobility with temperature along with a decreasing mobility at each temperature for increasing concentration. The higher mobility device exhibits a decrease in mobility with increasing temperature along with a decrease in mobility with increasing concentration at each temperature. In both sets of devices, the polar analyte produced reductions in drain current and shifts in threshold voltage.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Torsi, L. Dodabalapur, A. Sabbatini, L. PG Zambonin Sens Actuators B 67, 312 (2000).Google Scholar
2 Crone, BK, Dodabalapur, A. Gelperin, A, Torsi, L. Katz, HE, Lovinger, AJ, Bao, Z. J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 78, 2229 (2001).Google Scholar
3 Torsi, L. Lovinger, AJ, Crone, B. Someya, T. Dodabalapur, A. Katz, HE, A Gelperin J. Phys. Chem. B 106, 12563 (2002)Google Scholar
4 Wang, L. Fine, D. Sharma, D. Torsi, L. Dodabalapur, A. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 384, 310 (2006)10.1007/s00216-005-0150-2Google Scholar
5 Knipp, D. Street, RA, Volkel, A, Ho, J J. Appl. Phys. 93, 347 (2003)Google Scholar
6 Knipp, D. Street, RA, Volkel, A Appl. Phys. Lett. 82, 3907 (2003)10.1063/1.1578536Google Scholar
7 Fritz, SE, Kelley, TW, Frisbie, CD J. Phys. Chem. B 109, 10574 (2005)Google Scholar
8 Zhu, M, Lang, G. Cui, T. Varahramyan, K. Solid State Electronics 49, 884 (2005)Google Scholar