Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9b74x Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-03T20:18:12.796Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evidence of Modifications of Micellar Interface In Sol-GelGlass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Christina M. Catuara
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115-2862
Chhiu-Tsu Lin
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL 60115-2862
Get access

Abstract

A new sol-gel procedure using micellar solutions has been developed toimmobilize local anesthetic drugs in optically transparent glass. Dibucainewas selected as a direct emission probe at 77 K for determining the forms ofthe anesthetic drug (free base, monoprotonated, and/or diprotonated) and itslocation (hydrophobic core, interfacial layer or hydrophilic region) inmicelles. The photophysical properties of local anesthetics obtained in gelsare compared to those in solutions. During the gelation stage, thepredominant drug species was identified as free base dibucaine embedded inthe hydrophobic core of neutral as well as charged micelles. Thisobservation suggests that the micellar interface was modified by the largehydrophilic gel surface during the gelation stage. The modified micellarinterface allows an increase in the partition of free base dibucaine intothe hydrophobic region. At the xerogel stage, however, the collapse ofmicellar structure provides a direct interaction of dibucaine with theacidic gel surface, leading to a formation of diprotonated dibucaine. Theresults are discussed in terms of molecular basis of pharmacologicalimplications such as drug delivery, release, and transport undermicroencapsulation conditions.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1 Yamanaka, S. A., Nishida, F., Ellerby, L. M., Nishida, C. R., Dunn, B., Valentine, J. S. and Zink, J. I., Chem. Mater. 4, 495 (1992).Google Scholar
2 Braun, S., Rappoport, S., Zusman, R., Avnir, D., Ottolenghi, M., Mater. Lett. 10, 1 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Lin, C. T., Malaie, M., Vanderkooi, G. and Mason, W. R., Photochem. Photobiol. 45, 749 (1987).Google Scholar
4 Lin, C. T., Williamson, L. N., Chyan, Y. G. and Marques, A. D. S., Photochem. Photobiol. 48, 733 (1988).Google Scholar
5 Mertz, C. J. and Lin, C. T., Photochem. Photobiol. 53, 307 (1991).Google Scholar
6 Mertz, C. J., PhD thesis, Northern Illinois University, 1992.Google Scholar
7 Vanderkooi, G., Photochem. Photobiol. 39, 755 (1984).Google Scholar