Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T04:47:59.227Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Examination of the Dynamic Mechanical Properties of Tissue Engineering Scaffolds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Heather Kauth
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Biomedical Materials Research, Boston University, Dept. of Manufacturing Engineering
Catherine Klapperich
Affiliation:
Laboratory for Biomedical Materials Research, Boston University, Dept. of Manufacturing Engineering Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, 44. Cummington St., Boston, Massachusetts 02215
Get access

Abstract

Scaffolds of both natural and synthetic materials have been widely utilized to provide a three dimensional environment for cell growth. The characteristics of these scaffolds play a vital, but sometimes ambiguous, role in tissue engineering constructs. Collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices have been used clinically as artificial skin implants. Previous research in our laboratory on this model has shown that gene expression is regulated by mechanical stress applied to the matrix. In this work we begin the process of quantifying the effects of mechanical stress and preparation technique on a matrix comprised of type I collagen and chondroitin-6-sulfate. Compressive loads were applied to the matrices using a dynamic mechanical analyzer at 37 degrees Celsius and retrofitted with 5% carbon dioxide gas flow. All samples were tested hydrated in either simulated body fluid or PBS. Storage and loss modulus data are presented. Mechanical tests were performed on collagen-GAG meshes both seeded with humandermal fibroblasts and not seeded with cells. Continuing work includes gene expression analysis of the cells on the seeded matrices in order to identify differential gene expression induced by mechanicalloading.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Yannas, IV, “Biologically active analogues of the extracellular matrix; artificial skin and nerves.” Agnew Chem, Int Ed 1990; 29; 2035 Google Scholar
2. Wang, XH, Li, DP, Wang, WJ, Feng, QL, Cui, FZ, Xu, YX, Song, XH, Werf, Mark van der. “Crosslinked collagen/chitosan matrix for artificial livers.” Biomaterials 2003; 24; 32133220 Google Scholar
3. Lee, CR, Grodzinsky, AJ, Spector, M.The effects of cross-linking of collagen glycosaminoglycan scaffolds on compressive stiffness, chondrocytes-mediated contraction, proliferation and biosynthesis.” Biomaterials 2001; 22; 31453154 Google Scholar
4. Pieper, JS, Hafmans, T, Veerkamp, JH, van Kuppevelt, TH. “Development of tailor-made collagen-glycosaminoglycan matrices: EDC/NHS crosslinking, and ultrastructural aspects.” Biomaterials 2000; 21; 581593 Google Scholar
5. Freyman, TM, Yannas, IV, Yokoo, R, Gibson, LJ. “Fibroblast contraction of a collagen-GAG matrix.” Biomaterials 2001; 22; 28832891 Google Scholar
6. Pek, Y.S., Spector, M., Yannas, I.V., and Gibson, L.J., “Degradation of a collagen-chondroitin-6-sulfate matrix by collagenase and by chondriotinase,” Biomaterials 2004; 25; 473482 Google Scholar