Hostname: page-component-7dd5485656-wlg5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-28T01:18:06.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fatigue Behavior of GeO2-SiO2 Glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Suresh T. Gulati  and
John D. Helfinstine
Suresh T. Gulati
Affiliation:
Science & Technology Division, Coming Incorporated, Coming, NY 14831, USA
John D. Helfinstine
Affiliation:
Science & Technology Division, Coming Incorporated, Coming, NY 14831, USA
Get access

Abstract

The fatigue behavior of binary oxide glasses in the germania-silica system is interesting since it influences the long-term mechanical reliability of products made of these glasses. Dynamic fatigue tests were carried out in four-point bending in 100% RH using tumble abraded rods. The fatigue data were obtained as a function of GeO2 content which ranged from 0 to 24 mole %. In addition, other physical properties of these glasses, such as the thermal expansion coefficient, were measured as a function of GeO2 content. The results of these tests and analyses are highlighted in this paper.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 531: Symposium DD – Reliabilty of Photonics Materials & Structures , 1998 , 133
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Huang, Y.Y., Sarkar, A. and Schultz, P.C.; “Relationship between Composition, Density and Refractive Index for Germania Silica Glasses,” J. Noncryst. Solids, Vol.27, 1978., pp 29–37.10.1016/0022-3093(78)90033-9Google Scholar
2. Riebling, E.F.; “Structural Similarities Between a Glass and its Melt,” J.Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol.51; 1968.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1968.tb11857.xGoogle Scholar
3. Borelli, N.F.; “The Infrared Spectra of SiO2-GeO2 Glass.” Phys. Chem. Glasses, Vol.10; 1969.Google Scholar
4. Kolesova, and Shev, ; Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR. Neorg. Mater., Vol.9, 1973.Google Scholar
5. ASTM C-693, “Test Methodfor Density of Glass by Buoyancy,” Vol.15.02.Google Scholar
6. ASTM C-623, “Standard Test Method for Young's Modulus, Shear Modulus, and Poisson's Ratio for Glass and Glass- Ceramics by Resonance,” Vol.15.02.Google Scholar
7. ASTM C-598, “Standard Test Method for Annealing Point and Strain Point of Glass by Beam Bending,” Vol.15.02.Google Scholar
8. Ritter, J.E. and Sherburne, C.L., “Dynamic and Static Fatigue of Silicate Glasses,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., Vol.54 (12), 1971.10.1111/j.1151-2916.1971.tb16013.xGoogle Scholar
9. ASTM C- 158, “Standard Test Methods for Strength of Glass by Flexure (Determination of Modulus of Rupture)“, Vol 15.02.Google Scholar
10. Tummala, R.R., “Stress Corrosion Resistance Compared with Thermal Expansion and Chemical Durability of Glasses,” Glass Technology, Vol.17 (4), 1976.Google Scholar