Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-04T15:32:51.381Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Feasibility of USD Method in Tracking Past Hydrogeochemical Changes in the Fennoscandian Shield

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Kari Rasilainen ,
Juhani Suksi ,
Timo Ruskeeniemi  and
Petteri Pitkänen
Kari Rasilainen
Affiliation:
VTT Processes, P.O. Box 1608, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland;
Juhani Suksi
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 55, FIN-00014 HY, Finland;
Timo Ruskeeniemi
Affiliation:
Geological Survey of Finland P.O. Box 96, FIN-02151 ESPOO, Finland;
Petteri Pitkänen
Affiliation:
VTT Building and Transport, P.O. Box 1800, FIN-02044 VTT, Finland
Get access

Abstract

Uranium-series disequilibrium (USD) method is the only paleohydrogeological method that for the time scale relevant for performance assessments can detect and directly date past hydrogeochemical changes. Such changes cause U mobility which is seen as uranium-series disequilibrium. We have reviewed the method taking into account experimental and interpretation aspects and identified pros seem to outweigh identified cons. Reported USD studies in Finland and Sweden have earlier been mostly qualitative but a quantitative methodology has been developed for future studies.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 807: Symposium Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXVII , 2003 , 565
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Gascoyne, M. & Harmon, R.S. 1992. Palaeoclimatology and palaeosea levels. In: Ivanovich, M. & Harmon, R.S. (eds.) Uranium-series disequilibrium: Applications to earth, marine and environmental sciences, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2nd edition, pp. 553–582.Google Scholar
2. Smellie, J.A.T. 1985. Mineralogical Magazine, Vol. 49, 271–279.Google Scholar
3. Smellie, J.A.T., MacKenzie, A.B. & Scott, R.D. 1986. Chem. Geol. vol. 55, 233–254.Google Scholar
4. Griffault, L.Y., Gascoyne, M., Kamineni, C., Kerrich, R. & Vandergraaf, T. T. 1993. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta vol. 57, 1181–1202.Google Scholar
5. Landström, O., Tullborg, E-L., Erikson, G. & Sandell, Y., 2001. SKB Report R-01–37.Google Scholar
6. Suksi, J., Rasilainen, K., Casanova, J., Ruskeeniemi, T., Blomqvist, R. & Smellie, J.A.T. 2001. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, vol. 47, 187 - 196.Google Scholar
7. Siitari-Kauppi, M. 2002. Doctoral thesis. University of Helsinki, Report Series in Radiochemistry 17/2002.Google Scholar
8. Stuckless, J.S. & Pires Ferreira, C. 1976. IAEA-SM-208/17, 717–729.Google Scholar
9. Zielinski, R.A., Peterman, Z.E., Stuckless, J.S., Rosholt, J.N. & Nkomo, I.T. 1981. Contrib. Mineral. Petrol. vol. 78, 209–219.Google Scholar
10. Blomqvist, R., Ruskeeniemi, T., Kaija, J., Ahonen, L., Paananen, M., Smellie, J., Grundfelt, B., Pedersen, K., Bruno, J., Pérez de Villar, L., Cera, E., Rasilainen, K., Pitkänen, P., Suksi, J., Casanova, J., Read, D. & Frape, S. 2000. EUR 19611 EN.Google Scholar
11. Langmuir, D. 1997. Aqueous Environmental Geochemistry. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 600 p.Google Scholar
12. Rasilainen, K. & Suksi, J. 1997. Nuclear Technology, vol. 120, pp. 254–260.Google Scholar
13. Pitkänen, P., Luukkonen, A., Ruotsalainen, P., Leino-Forsman, H., & Vuorinen, U. 1999. Posiva 98–10.Google Scholar
14. Rasilainen, K. 1997. Doctoral thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, VTT Publications 331.Google Scholar
15. Gascoyne, M. 1999. Report SKB R-99–41Google Scholar
16. Suksi, J. 2001. Doctoral thesis. University of Helsinki, Report Series in Radiochemistry 16/2001.Google Scholar
17. Rasilainen, K., Suksi, J., Ruskeeniemi, T., Pitkänen, P. & Poteri, A. 2003. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology. 61, 235–246.Google Scholar
18. Marcos, N., Siitari-Kauppi, M., Suksi, J., Rasilainen, K. & Hellmuth, K-H. 2002. Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. vol. 663, p. 1053–1063.Google Scholar
19. Marcos, N. 2002. Doctoral thesis. Helsinki University of Technology, Acta Polytechnica Scandinavica, Ci124.Google Scholar
20. Löfvendahl, R. & Holm, E. 1981. Lithos, Vol. 14, 189–201.Google Scholar