Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-br6xx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-03T09:44:45.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Finite Element Analysis of Nanoscale Thermal Measurements of Superlattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Jason R. Foley  and
C. Thomas Avedisian
Jason R. Foley
Affiliation:
Thermal Sciences Laboratory, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853
C. Thomas Avedisian
Affiliation:
Thermal Sciences Laboratory, Sibley School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 14853
Get access

Abstract

A finite element analysis applicable to two- and three-dimensional heat flow in samples of arbitrary geometry and composition is presented for use in a thermal wave experiment. The finite element formulation is summarized, including the use of symmetry to simplify the problem, and the governing differential equations for the heat transport are found to be in the form of the Helmholtz equation for the specific case of a modulated heat source. Simulated data for a Nb/Si superlattice is calculated using the finite element code and is shown to agree with predictions from an analytical model, validating the approach taken.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 739: Symposium H – Three-Dimensional Nanoengineered Assemblies , 2002 , H6.8
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Huebner, K. H., Dewhirst, D. L., Smith, D. E., and Byrom, T. G., The Finite Element Method for Engineers, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 40–56, 288–303, 654–655 (2001).Google Scholar
2. Mandelis, A., Phys. Today 20, 29–34 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Ångström, A. J., Annln. Phys. Lpz. 114, 513–520 (1861).Google Scholar
4. Cahill, D. G., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 61, 802–808 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Jackson, W., Amer, N. M., Boccara, A. C., and Fournier, D., Appl. Opt. 20, 1333–1344 (1981).Google Scholar
6. Murphy, J. C. and Aamodt, L. C., J. Appl. Phys. 51, 4580–4588 (1980).Google Scholar
7. Foley, J. R. and Avedisian, C. T., Proc. of the 2002 IMECE, ASME, IMECE2002–32443 1–9 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Arpaci, V. S., Conduction Heat Transfer, Addison-Wesley, Reading, 167–178 (1966).Google Scholar
9. CASCA and FRANC2D are available from the Cornell Fracture Group (downloadable from www.cfg.cornell.edu), courtesy of Prof. Tony Ingraffea.Google Scholar