Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T04:07:35.312Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flow-Diversion Barriers for HLW and LLW Disposal Under Partially Saturated Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

M. J. Apted ,
P. F. Salter  and
J. L. Conca
M. J. Apted
Affiliation:
Intera Information Technologies, Inc., Denver, Colorado 80235USA
P. F. Salter
Affiliation:
Intera Information Technologies, Inc., Denver, Colorado 80235USA
J. L. Conca
Affiliation:
UFA Laboratory, Washington State University, Richland, Washington 99352USA
Get access

Abstract

An innovative EBS design of sand-gravel layers for waste disposal under partially saturated conditions is described. Advantages of this EBS are 1) as a hydraulic barrier to advective inflow from the surrounding rock, and 2) as a diffusion barrier to the transport of dissolved or colloidal radionuclides. This sand-gravel barrier design for unsaturated sites is analogous to EBS designs using compacted bentonite backfills/buffers in saturated repository sites. Percolation box experiments, field tests, and natural analogues supporting the advantageous performance of this flow-diversion design are described and estimates for source-term release are calculated.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 353: Symposium – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XVIII , 1994 , 471
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] SKB, SKB 91: Final Disposal of Spent Nuclear Fuel. Importance of the Bedrock for Safety. TR 92–20, Swedish Nuclear Fuel and Waste Management. Co., Stockholm, Sweden (1992).Google Scholar
[2] McCombie, C., McKinley, I, and Zuidema, P., “Sufficient validation: The value of robustness in performance assessment and system design,” in International Symposium GEOVAL-90. Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, France (1990).Google Scholar
[3] Conca, J.L., “Diffusion barrier transport properties of unsaturated Paintbrush tuff rubble backfill”, in First Annual International Conference on High-Level Radioactive Waste Management. Vol. 1, American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL, 394 (1990).Google Scholar
[4] Conca, J. and Wright, J.., “Diffusion coefficients in gravel under unsaturated conditions,” Water Resources Res., 26, 1055–1066, (1990).Google Scholar
[5] Schulz, R.K., Ridky, R. W, and O’Donnell, E., Control of Water Infiltration into Near Surface LLW Disposal Units. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Publication NUREG/CR–4918, Vol. 6, (1992).Google Scholar
[6] Wanatabe, K. “Archeological evidence supports a preferred soil cap for LLRW disposal,” in Proceedings of the 1989 Joint International Waste Management Conference. Kvoto. Japan, eds. Feizollahi, F. and Susuki, A., The American Society of Mechanical Engineers, vol. 1, (1989).Google Scholar
[7] Buscheck, T., Nitao, J., and Chesnut, D., “The impact of episodic non-equilibrium fracture-matrix flow on geological repository performance,” in Proc. of the ANS Topical Mtg. on Nuclear Waste Packaging. Focus ’91. Las Vegas. NV. Sept. 30-Oct. 2, 1991. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL (1991).Google Scholar
[8] Conca, J., Apted, M., and Arthur, R., “Direct determination of transport parameters in repository materials,” Sci. Basis for Nuclear Waste Disposal XVI ed. Interrante, C. and Pabalan, R., Mat. Res. Soc., Pittsburgh, PA, 839–844 (1993).Google Scholar
[9] Apted, M. and Hodgkinson, D., “Logic over rhetoric: the role of performance analysis in guiding near-field data collection,” in Proc. of the ANS Topical Mtg. on Nuclear Waste Packaging. Focus ’91, Las Vegas. NV. Sept. 30-Oct. 2. 1991. American Nuclear Society, La Grange Park, IL (1991).Google Scholar