Skip to main content

Fracture Mechanisms of Bone: A Comparative Study between Antler and Bovine Femur

  • P.Y. Chen (a1), F.A. Sheppard (a2), J.M. Curiel (a2) and J. McKittrick (a1) (a2)

In this study, fracture toughness of North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) antler and bovine femur were measured using four-point bending tests on single-edge notched compact samples (ASTM C1421). Tests were conducted on crack growth directions longitudinal and transverse to the long axis of antler and bone in both dry and hydrated conditions to study the effects of fiber orientation and hydration. Fracture toughness results in the transverse orientation were much higher than that in the longitudinal orientation and increased with degree of hydration for both antler and bovine femur. The fracture toughness of antler was ∼ 50% higher than that of bovine femur. The highest fracture toughness value was obtained from the hydrated antler in the transverse orientation, which reached 10.31 MPa·m1/2 compared to that measured from bovine femur, which was 6.35 MPa·m1/2. The crack propagation and fracture surface were characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Toughening mechanisms, including crack deflection by osteons, uncracked ligament bridging, and microcracks formation, are observed and discussed. Comparisons between antler and bone are made.

Hide All
1.Henshaw, J., Nature 231, 469 (1971).
2.Chapman, D.I., Mam Review 5, 121 (1975).
3.Currey, J.D., J Biomech 12, 313 (1979).
4.Skedros, J.G., Durand, P., Bloebaum, R.D., J Bone Miner Res 10 (Suppl 1), 441 (1995).
5.Currey, J.D., Philos Trans R Roc Lond B 304, 509 (1984).
6.Zioupos, P., Currey, J.D., Sedman, A.J, Med Eng Phys 16, 203 (1994).
7.Kitchener, A.C., “Fighting and the mechanical design of horns and antlers,” Biomechanics in animal behaviour, ed. Domenici, P. and Blake, R.W. (Oxford 2000).
8.Blob, R.W., Snelgrove, J. M., J Morphol 267, 1075 (2006).
9.Landete-Castillejos, T., Currey, J.D., Estevez, J.A., Gaspar-López, E., Garcia, A., Gallego, L., Bone 41, 794 (2007).
10.Chen, P.-Y., Stokes, A.G., McKittrick, J., Acta Biomater 5, 693 (2009).
11.Robertson, D.M., Robertson, D., Barret, C.R., J Biomech 11, 359 (1978).
12.Bonfield, W., Grynpas, M.D., Young, R.J., J Biomech 11, 473 (1978).
13.Vashishth, D., Tanner, K.E., Bonfield, W., J Biomech 33, 1169 (2000).
14.Yeni, Y.N., Norman, T.L., J Biomed Mater Res 51, 504 (2000).
15.Lucksanambool, P., Higgs, W.A.J., Higgs, R.J.E.D., Swain, M.W., Biomaterials 22, 3127 (2001).
16.Nalla, R.K., Kinney, J.H., Ritchie, R.O., Nature Materials 2, 164 (2003).
17.Vashishth, D., J Biomech 37, 943 (2004).
18.Nalla, R.K., Kruzic, J.J, Kinney, J.H., Ritchie, R.O., Biomaterials 26, 217 (2005).
19.Adharapurapu, R.R., Jiang, F., Vecchio, K.S., Mater Sci Eng C 26, 1325 (2006).
20.ASTM C1421-01b. “Standard test methods for determination of fracture toughness of advanced ceramics,” In: Annual Book of ASTM Standards vol 15.01 (PA, ASTM 2006).
21.Nalla, R.K., Balooch, M., Ager, J.W., Kruzic, J.J, Kinney, J.H., Ritchie, R.O., Acta Biomater 1, 31 (2005).
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 5 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 74 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.