Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Fracture Mechanisms of Bone: A Comparative Study between Antler and Bovine Femur

  • P.Y. Chen (a1), F.A. Sheppard (a2), J.M. Curiel (a2) and J. McKittrick (a1) (a2)
Abstract
ABSTRACT

In this study, fracture toughness of North American elk (Cervus elaphus canadensis) antler and bovine femur were measured using four-point bending tests on single-edge notched compact samples (ASTM C1421). Tests were conducted on crack growth directions longitudinal and transverse to the long axis of antler and bone in both dry and hydrated conditions to study the effects of fiber orientation and hydration. Fracture toughness results in the transverse orientation were much higher than that in the longitudinal orientation and increased with degree of hydration for both antler and bovine femur. The fracture toughness of antler was ∼ 50% higher than that of bovine femur. The highest fracture toughness value was obtained from the hydrated antler in the transverse orientation, which reached 10.31 MPa·m1/2 compared to that measured from bovine femur, which was 6.35 MPa·m1/2. The crack propagation and fracture surface were characterized using scanning electron microscopy. Toughening mechanisms, including crack deflection by osteons, uncracked ligament bridging, and microcracks formation, are observed and discussed. Comparisons between antler and bone are made.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1. J. Henshaw , Nature 231, 469 (1971).

2. D.I. Chapman , Mam Review 5, 121 (1975).

3. J.D. Currey , J Biomech 12, 313 (1979).

5. J.D. Currey , Philos Trans R Roc Lond B 304, 509 (1984).

6. P. Zioupos , J.D. Currey , A.J Sedman , Med Eng Phys 16, 203 (1994).

8. R.W. Blob , J. M. Snelgrove , J Morphol 267, 1075 (2006).

9. T. Landete-Castillejos , J.D. Currey , J.A. Estevez , E. Gaspar-López , A. Garcia , L. Gallego , Bone 41, 794 (2007).

10. P.-Y. Chen , A.G. Stokes , J. McKittrick , Acta Biomater 5, 693 (2009).

11. D.M. Robertson , D. Robertson , C.R. Barret , J Biomech 11, 359 (1978).

12. W. Bonfield , M.D. Grynpas , R.J. Young , J Biomech 11, 473 (1978).

13. D. Vashishth , K.E. Tanner , W. Bonfield , J Biomech 33, 1169 (2000).

14. Y.N. Yeni , T.L. Norman , J Biomed Mater Res 51, 504 (2000).

15. P. Lucksanambool , W.A.J. Higgs , R.J.E.D. Higgs , M.W. Swain , Biomaterials 22, 3127 (2001).

16. R.K. Nalla , J.H. Kinney , R.O. Ritchie , Nature Materials 2, 164 (2003).

17. D. Vashishth , J Biomech 37, 943 (2004).

18. R.K. Nalla , J.J Kruzic , J.H. Kinney , R.O. Ritchie , Biomaterials 26, 217 (2005).

19. R.R. Adharapurapu , F. Jiang , K.S. Vecchio , Mater Sci Eng C 26, 1325 (2006).

21. R.K. Nalla , M. Balooch , J.W. Ager , J.J Kruzic , J.H. Kinney , R.O. Ritchie , Acta Biomater 1, 31 (2005).

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL)
  • ISSN: -
  • EISSN: 1946-4274
  • URL: /core/journals/mrs-online-proceedings-library-archive
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 2 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 53 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 21st September 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.