Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T09:20:54.733Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gas Migration in MX80 Buffer Bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

S. T. Horseman
Affiliation:
Fluid Processes Group, British Geological Survey, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
J. F. Harrington
Affiliation:
Fluid Processes Group, British Geological Survey, Nottingham, NG12 5GG, UK
P. Sellin
Affiliation:
Svensk Kärbränslehantering AB (SKB), PO Box 5864, S102 48 Stockholm, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

Controlled flow-rate gas injection experiments have been performed on pre-compacted samples of KBS-3 specification M×801 buffer bentonite using helium as a safe replacement for hydrogen. By simultaneously applying a confining pressure and backpressure, specimens were isotropically-consolidated and fully water-saturated under pre-determined effective stress conditions, before injecting gas using a syringe pump. Ingoing and outgoing gas fluxes were monitored. All tests exhibited a conspicuous threshold pressure for breakthrough, somewhat larger than the sum of the swelling pressure and the backpressure. All tests showed a post-peak negative transient leading to steady-state gas flow. Using a stepped history of flow rate, the flow law was shown to be nonlinear. With the injection pump stationary (i.e. zero applied flow rate), gas pressure declined with time to a finite value. When gas flow was reestablished, the threshold value for gas breakthrough was found to be significantly lower than in virgin clay. There is strong evidence to suggest that the capillary pressure for the penetration of interparticle pore space of buffer bentonite is of such a magnitude that normal two-phase flow is impossible. Gas entry and breakthrough is therefore accompanied by the development of microcracks which propagate through the clay from gas source to sink. The experiments suggest that these pathways open under high gas pressure conditions and partially close if gas pressure falls, providing a possible explanation of the nonlinearity of the flow law.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Horseman, S., Higgo, J., Alexander, J. and Harrington, J.. Water, gas and solute movement in argillaceous media. Prepared by BGS for NEA SEDE Working Group on Measurement and Physical Understanding of Groundwater Flow Through Argillaceous Media. Rept. No. CC-96/1, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, Paris, 1996, 290 pp, 26 figs.Google Scholar
Sen, M., Horseman, S. and Harrington, J.. Further studies on the movement of gas and water in an overconsolidatedclay. EU MEGAS Project Phase 2. Fluid Processes Group, British Geological Survey, Technical Rept. No. WE/96/8, 1996.Google Scholar