Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-pftt2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-01T17:45:07.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A General Method for Determining the Mechanical Properties Needed for the Computer Analysis of Polymeric Structures Subjected to Changes in Temperature and Relative Humidity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Marion F. Mecklenburg ,
Charles S. Tumosa  and
Mark H. McCormick-Goodhart
Marion F. Mecklenburg
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory Smithsonian Institution, Washington
Charles S. Tumosa
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory Smithsonian Institution, Washington
Mark H. McCormick-Goodhart
Affiliation:
Conservation Analytical Laboratory Smithsonian Institution, Washington
Get access

Abstract

This study examines the methods for determining the effects of temperature and relative humidity (RH) on the dimensional and mechanical properties of artists' materials. Using both of these properties, typical cultural objects, such as paintings and photographs can be modeled on the computer to correlate the magnitude of developed stresses to environmental changes. Comparing these calculated stresses with the measured strength of the materials provides the opportunity to assess the potential risk from damage due to environmental change. Recognizing that the mechanical properties of polymeric materials are functions of the rate of the application of load, the time they are subjected to a load, the temperature and the relative humidity, it becomes a question of identifying those parameters that are the most important in determining the correct information needed for computer modeling.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 267: Symposium J – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology III , 1992 , 337
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Footnotes

1. Higdon, A., Ohlsen, E.H., Stiles, W.B., and Weese, J.A., Mechanics of Materials, Wiley & Sons, (1967) 58–59.Google Scholar
2. Mecklenburg, M.F., “Some Aspects of the Mechanical Behavior of Fabric Supported Paintings”, Report to the Smithsonian Institution, (1982), 12–15.; M.F. Mecklenburg, “The Effects of Atmospheric Moisture on the Mechanical Properties of Collagen Under Equilibrium Conditions”, AIC Preprints of papers presentedat the 16th Annual Meeting, (1988), 231-244; M.F. Mecklenburg, “Applied Mechanics of Materials in Conservation Research”,Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology II, Materials Research Society Symposium Proceedings, Vol 185, P.B. Vandiver, J. Druzik,and G.S. Wheeler, Eds., (1991), 105-124; G. Hedley, “Relative Humidity and the Stress/Strain Response of Canvas Paintings: 358Uniaxial Measurements of Naturally Ages Samples”, Studies InConservation, Vol. 33, No. 3, (1988), 133-148; A. Karpowicz, “In-Plane Deformations of Films of Size on Paintings in the Glass Transition Region”, Studies In Conservation, Vol. 34, No. 2, (1989), 67-74; A. Karpowicz, “A Study on Development of Cracks onPaintings”, Journal of the American Institute for Conservation,Vol. 29, No. 2, (1990), 169-180.Google Scholar
3. Cook, R.D., Concepts and Applications of Finite Element Analysis, Wiley, (1974), 173–188; J.S. Przemienicki, Theory of Matrix Structural Analysis, McGraw-Hill, (1968).Google Scholar
4. Mecklenburg, M.F. and Tumosa, C.S., “An Introduction Into the Mechanical Behavior of Paintings Under Rapid Loading Conditions”,Art in Transit, Mecklenburg, M.F., Ed. The National Gallery of Art,Washington, D.C., (1991a) 137–172; M.F. Mecklenburg and C.S. Tumosa, “Mechanical Behavior of Paintings Subjected to Changes in Temperature and Relative Humidity”, Art in Transit,M.F.Mecklenburg, Ed. The National Gallery of Art, Washington,D.C., (1991b) 172-214.Google Scholar
5. , Mecklenburg and , Tumosa, (1991b), 177–179.Google Scholar
6. , Mecklenburg and , Tumosa, (1991a), 137–139.Google Scholar
7. Eastman Kodak Co., Conservation of Photographs, Publication No.F-40, 1985.Google Scholar
8. Imaging Processes and Materials. Neblett's Eicthth Edition, Sturge, J.M., Walworth, V., and Skepp, A., Eds., Van Nostrand Reinhold,New York, (1989) 129–130.Google Scholar