Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-20T01:44:49.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Geochemistry of the Castile Brines: Implications for their Origin and Impact on the Wipp Site(1)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

W. E. Coons ,
D. Meyer ,
R. L. Olsen  and
J. K. Register
W. E. Coons
Affiliation:
D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, 2340 Alamo S.E., Suite 306, Albuquerque, NM 87106.
D. Meyer
Affiliation:
D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, 2340 Alamo S.E., Suite 306, Albuquerque, NM 87106.
R. L. Olsen
Affiliation:
D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, 2340 Alamo S.E., Suite 306, Albuquerque, NM 87106.
J. K. Register
Affiliation:
D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, 2340 Alamo S.E., Suite 306, Albuquerque, NM 87106.
Get access

Abstract

Pressurized brine reservoirs have been found in the Castile anhydrite which underlies the proposed Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. The major and minor component chemistry of the brines and the isotopic abundances of the brines and coexisting minerals have been determined and evaluated. Thermodynamic calculations indicate that the brines approach saturation with all major minerals in their host horizon. The brines therefore, appear to be in equilibrium with their geologic environment and do not have the capacity for substantially degrading the integrity of the site. When analyzed through solute versus bromide plots, the data indicate that the most likely origin for the brines is Permian seawater. As a result, the reservoirs appear to have been derived from waters no longer being introduced into the rock (i.e., they have a finite source).

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 26: Symposium D – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management VII , 1983 , 49
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Popielak, , , R. S., Beauheim, R. L., Black, S. R., Coons, W. E., Ellingson, C. T., and Olsen, R. L., 1983, “Brine Reservoirs in the Castile Formation, Southeastern New Mexico,” The Westinghouse Electric Corporation, TME 3153, prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy, WIPP Project Office, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
2. Carpenter, , , A. B., 1978, Origin and Chemical Evolution of Brines in Sedimentary Basins: Oklahoma Geological Survey Circular 79, pp. 60–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Lambert, , , S. J., 1978, Geochemistry of Delaware Basin Ground Waters: New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources, Circular 159, pp. 33–38.Google Scholar
4. Martinez, , principal author, J. D.), 1979, An Investigation of the Utility of Gulf Coast Salt Domes for the Storage or Disposal of Radioactive Waste: Institute for Environmental Studies, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA.Google Scholar
5. Craig, , , H., Gordon, L. I., and Horibe, Y., 1963, Isotopic Exchange Effects in the Evaporation of Water, I. Low temperature experimental results, Journal of Geophysical Res., 68, pp. 5079–5087.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sofer, , , A. and Gat, J. R., 1975, The Isotope Composition of Evaporating Brines: Effect of the Isotopic Activity Ratio in Saline Solutions: Earth Planet. Sci. Letters, 26, pp. 179–186.Google Scholar
7. Claypool, , , G. E., Holser, W. T., Kaplan, I. R., Sakai, H., and Zak, I., 1980, The Age Curves of Sulfur and Oxygen Isotopes in Marine Sulfate and Their Mutual Interpretation: Chem. Geology, 28, 199–260.Google Scholar
8. Craig, , , H., 1961, Standard for Reporting Concentration of Deuterium and Oxygen – 18 in Natural Waters: Science, 133, pp., 1833–1834.Google Scholar
9. Kharaka, , , Y. K., Berry, F. A. F., and Friedman, I., 1973, Isotope Composition of Oil-Field Brines from Kettleman North Dome, California, and Their Geologic Implications: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 37, pp. 1899–1908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Harvie, , , C. E., and Weare, J. H., 1980. The Prediction of Mineral Solubilities in Natural Waters: the Na-K-Mg-Ca-Cl-SO4-H2O System from Zero to High Concentration at 25°C: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 44, pp. 981–997.Google Scholar
11. Harvie, , , C. E., Eugster, H. P., and Weare, J. H., 1980. Mineral Equilibria in the Six-Component Seawater System, Na-K-Mg-Ca-SO4-Cl-H2O at 25°C – II. Compositions of the Saturated Solutions: Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 46, pp. 1603–1618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Clayton, , , R. N., Friedman, I., Graf, D. L., Mayeda, T. K., Meents, W. F., and Shimp, N. F., 1966. The Origin of Saline Formation Waters, 1. Isotopic compositions: Jour. of Geophys. Res., 71, pp. 3869–3882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Matthews, , , A. and Katz, A., 1977, Oxygen Istotope Fractionation During the Dolomitization of Calcium Carbonate, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 41, pp. 1431–1438. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. D'Appolonia Consulting Engineers, Inc., 1982. Data File Report – ERDA-6 and WIPP-12 Testing: Westinghouse Electric Corporation and U.S. Department of Energy, Albuquerque, NM.Google Scholar
15. Barnes, , , I. and Back, W., 1964, Dolomite Solubility in Ground Water: Article 160, in U.S. Geological Survey Prof. Paper 475-D, pp. D179–D180.Google Scholar