Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-22dnz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-29T22:56:54.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ge/Si(100) Island and Wetting Layer Composition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Yangting Zhang
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Tempe, AZ 85287–1504, U.S.A.
Jeff Drucker
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Dept. of Physics and Astronomy, Tempe, AZ 85287–1504, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstratct

Etching water soluble Ge-oxides was used to investigate Si interdiffusion into epitaxial Ge / Si(100) samples. The Ge coverage, θGe, was measured using Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) before and after water etching of samples grown at substrate temperatures between 400 °C and 650 °C. θGe was correlated with sample morphology determined using atomic force microscopy (AFM). The local Ge concentration was qualitatively assessed using energy dispersive x-ray (EDX) analysis. For samples grown at T=400 °C, water completely dissolves the islands and no Ge is detected by RBS. For samples grown at T=600 and 650 °C, AFM detects no change in the surface morphology and RBS indicates that θGe decreases by about 3 monolayers (ML). These results suggest that for growth at T=400 °C, both the islands and wetting layer are relatively pure Ge while for growth at T≥600 °C, the wetting layer is Ge rich compare to the SiGe alloy islands. EDX confirms this conclusion detecting no Ge signal between islands for etched samples grown at T≥600 °C. Our results suggest that for growth at T≥600 °C, Si interdiffusion into islands is through the region underneath the islands instead of from the wetting layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Chaparro, S., Drucker, J., Yangting, Z., Chandrasekhar, D., McCartney, M. and Smith, D. J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 1199 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Chaparro, S.A., Zhang, Y., Drucker, J., Chandrasekhar, D., and Smith, D. J., J. Appl. Phys. 87, 2245 (2000).Google Scholar
3. Liao, X.Z., Zou, J., Cockayne, D.J.H., Jiang, Z.M., Wang, X., Leon, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 77, 1305 (2000).Google Scholar
4. Magidson, V., Regelman, D.V., Beserman, R., and Dettmer, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1044 (1998).Google Scholar
5. Capellini, G., De Seta, M., and Evangelisti, F., Appl. Phys. Lett., 78, 303 (2001).Google Scholar
6. Drucker, J., Zhang, Y., Chaparro, S., Chandrasekhar, D., McCartney, M. and Smith, D. J., Surf. Rev. Lett. 7, 527 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Yangting, Zhang, Margaret, Floyd, Jeff, Drucker, Crozier, P.A., David J., Smith, and Driver, K.P., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. Vol. 727 R10.5 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Wan, J., Luo, Y.H., Jiang, Z.M., Jin, G., Liu, J.L., Wang, K.L., Liao, X.Z., and Zou, J., J. Appl. Phys. 90, 4290 (2001).Google Scholar
9. Chuan-Pu, Liu, Thin Solid Film 415, 296 (2002).Google Scholar
10. Zhang, Y. and Jeff, Drucker, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 618, 123 (2000).Google Scholar