Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T02:52:17.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Glass Surface area to Solution Volume Ratio and its Implications to Accelerated Leach Testing*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

Larry R. Pederson
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, Washington, USA
Charles Q. Buckwalter
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, Washington, USA
Gary L. Mcvay
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, Washington, USA
B. Lynn Riddle
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, P. O. Box 999, Richland, Washington, USA
Get access

Abstract

Leaching tests of PNL 76–68 glass in deionized water have been performed using the standard MCC-l static leaching procedure but with varied glass surface area to solution volume ratios (SA/V). It was found that leaching could be strongly influenced by the SA/V ratio, due largely to an effect of silicon solubility limitations. The conclusion that solubility and not solid state diffusion is most important in regulating leaching rates is supported by (1) the similarities in depth profiles of all soluble glass components with none depleted to depths greater than that of silicon despite vastly different solid state diffusivities, and (2) the lack of dependence of leaching rates on reaction layer thicknesses. To more directly examine the influence of dissolved silicon on glass leaching rates, leaching tests were performed in silicic acid solutions and in two actual groundwaters. As expected, leaching rates of all soluble glass components were reduced by amounts roughly proportional to the silicon saturation fraction. Since solubility modifies leaching rates in all but very dilute solutions, short-term tests at high SA/V values can be used to predict solution concentrations for long-term tests at low SA/V values, although reaction layers formed are not of the same thickness. Glass leaching data for a range of leaching times and SA/V values can be represented by a single curve when plotted versus the product of SA/V and time. However, the use of SA/V variations may have limited usefulness in accelerated leach testing for multicomponent systems. Events such as silica colloid and certain alteration phase formations modify the above relationship.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

Work supported by the U.S. Department of Energy under contract DE-AC06-76RLO 1830.

References

REFERENCES

1. Ethridge, E. C., Clark, D. E. and Hench, L. L., J. Phys. Chem. Glasses 25(2), 35 (1979).Google Scholar
2. Buckwalter, C. Q., Pederson, L. R. and McVay, G. L., J. Non-Crystalline Solids 49, 397 (1982).Google Scholar
3. Hench, L. L., Clark, D. E. and Yen-Bower, E. L., Nuclear and Chemical Waste Management 1, 59 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Pederson, L. R., Buckwalter, C. Q. and McVay, G. L., submitted to Nuclear Technology (1982).Google Scholar
5. Oversby, V. M., PNL-4382, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352 (1982) p. 97.Google Scholar
6. Slate, S. C., Bunnell, L. R., Ross, W. A., Simonen, F. A. and Westsik, J. H. Jr., Proc. Conf. High-Level Radioactive Solid Waste Forms, NUREG/CP-0005, Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, D.C. (1978).Google Scholar
7. Chapman, C. L., PNL-2904, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352 (1979).Google Scholar
8. Materials Characterization Center, Nuclear Waste Materials Handbook, Vol. 1, DOE/9IC-1400, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washinrton 99352 (1981).Google Scholar
9. Strachan, D. M. and Earnes, E. O., PNL-SA-10036, Pacific Northvest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352 (1980).Google Scholar
10. Grembow, B. E., Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Managemrent, Vol. 5, (1982).Google Scholar
11. McVay, G. L. and Buckwalter, C. Q., Nuclear Technology 51, 123 (1980).Google Scholar
12. Frischat, G. H., Ionic Diffusion in Oxide Glasses (Trans Tech Publications, Bay Village, Ohio 1975).Google Scholar
13. Clark, D. E., Pantano, C. G. Jr. and Hench, L. L., Corrosion of Glass (Magazines for Industry, New York 1979) p. 38.Google Scholar
14. Goto, K., J. Chem. Soc. Jap. Pure Chem. Sect. 76, 1364 (1955).Google Scholar
15. McVay, G. L. and Buckwalter, C. Q., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. (April, 1983).Google Scholar
16. Strachan, D. M.,Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management, Vol. 5. (1982).Google Scholar
17. Fullam, H. T., PNL-3614, Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352 (1981).Google Scholar