Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-w5vf4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-08T05:42:46.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hot Isostatic Press (Hip) Vitrification of Radwaste Concretes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Darryl D. Siemer ,
Barry E. Scheetz  and
Mary Lou Gougar
Darryl D. Siemer
Affiliation:
Lockheed Idaho Technologies Company, P. O. Box 1625, Idaho Falls, ID 83415-5213
Barry E. Scheetz
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA 16802
Mary Lou Gougar
Affiliation:
Materials Research Laboratory, Pennsylvania State University, College Park, PA 16802
Get access

Abstract

Properly prepared cementitious waste forms can be hot-isostatically-pressed into materials that exhibit performance equivalent to typical radwaste-type glasses. The HIPing conditions (temperature/pressure) required to “vitrify” these concretes are quite mild and therefore consistent with both safety and good productivity. This paper describes both the process and its products with reference to potential application to Idaho Chemical Processing Plant (ICPP) reprocessing wastes.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 412: Symposium V – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX , 1995 , 403
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1. Winograd, I. J., “Radioactive Waste Disposal in Thick Unsaturated Zones”, SCIENCE, v. 212, pp. 1457–1464, 1981.Google Scholar
2. Bonano, E. J., Chu, M. S. Y., Conrad, S. H. (SANDIA) and Dickman, P. T. (DOE-NEV), “The Disposal of Orphan Wastes Using the Greater Confinement Disposal Facility”, Waste Management ’91, Vol. 1, Post & Wacker Eds., pp. 861–868.Google Scholar
3. Price, L. L., “Disposal Configuration Options for Future Uses of Greater Confinement Disposal at the Nevada Test Site”, SANDIA Contractor Report SAND94-2105, UC-721, September 1994, 31 pp.Google Scholar
4. Davis, P. A., (SANDIA), personal communication.Google Scholar
5. Winograd, I. J., “Archaeology and Public Perception of a Transscientific Problem - Disposal of Toxic Wastes in the Unsaturated Zone”, USGS Circular 990, 1986.Google Scholar
6. Palmer, J. D. and Fairhall, G. A., “Properties of Cement Systems Containing Intermediate Level Wastes”, CEMENT and CONCRETE RESEARCH, vol.22, pp. 325–330, 1992.Google Scholar
7. Fairhall, G. A., “Encapsulation of Wastes Using Inorganic Cement”, BNFL technology presentation at the Shilo Inn, Idaho Falls, ID, June 30, 1993.Google Scholar
8. Another BNFL publication states that one of the UK’s “groutable” wastes, MAGNOX hulls, exhibits, “as much as 10 TBq/m3 alpha emitters”. Assuming a bulk density of 2 g/cm3, that corresponds to ˜135,000 nCi/g TRU. ICPP calcine averages ˜3400 nCi/g TRU.Google Scholar
9. “Solidification of High-Level Radioactive Wastes, Final Report”, National Academy of Science & National Academy of Engineering, doc. NUREG/CR-0895, July 1979, summary pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
10. Roy, R., “Radioactive Waste Disposal, Volume 1: The Waste Package”, Pergammon Press, 1982.Google Scholar
11. Dole, L. R., Rogers, G. C., Morgan, M. R., Stinton, D. P., Kessler, J. H., Robinson, S. M., and Moore, J. G., “Cement-Based Radioactive Waste Hosts Formed Under Elevated Temperatures and Pressures (FUETAP Concretes) for Savannah River Plant, High-Level Defense Waste”, doc. ORNL/TM-8579, 1983.Google Scholar
12. Federal Register/Vol. 57, No. 101, Tuesday May 26, 1992, pp. 22046–22047.Google Scholar
13. Raman, S. V., “Hot-Isostatically-Pressed Aluminosilicate Glass-Ceramic with Natural Crystalline Analogs for Immobilizing the Calcined HLW at the ICPP”, doc. WINCO-1 173 UC 510, December 1993.Google Scholar
14. The product would be a denitrated calcine containing ˜27% A12O3, ˜8% CaO, ˜32% CaF2, ˜6% Na2O, ˜1% K2O, ˜3% B2O3, ˜2% CdO, & ˜18% ZrO2. Denitration is important primarily because alkali metal oxidesare strongly basic - which favors cementitious reaction with amphoteric oxides (silica & alumina) to form desirable host minerals (e.g., zeolites).Google Scholar
15. Roy, D. M., “Cementitious Material in Nuclear Waste Management”, Cements Research Progress 1988, 261–292, 1990.Google Scholar
16. Raman, S. V., (LITCO), personal communication.Google Scholar
17. To save both time & money, the relative amounts of material dissolved from the powdered (100–200 mesh) specimens by 90°C water as a function of time were measured by determining the electrical conductivity of the solutions. The ordinate is in terms of NaNO3 equivalent.Google Scholar
18. Jantzen, C. M., Bibler, N. E., Beam, D. C., Crawford, C. L., and Pickett, M. A., “Characterization of the Defense Waste Processing Facility (DWPF) Environmental Assessment (EA) Glass Standard Reference Material”, doc. WSRC-TR-92-346, Rev. 1, 1993, p. 3.Google Scholar
19. Siemer, D. D., “Hot Isostatically Pressed Concrete as a Radwaste Form”, Proceedings of the 1995 American Ceramics Society Symposium on Waste Management, Cincinnati, OH, April 29 - May 4, 1995.Google Scholar
20. Cliff Orcutt, A. I. P., Proposal #070695-1, 1995.Google Scholar