Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-rkzlw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-06T11:39:59.179Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Hyrkkölä Native Copper Mineralization: a Natural Analoguefor Copper Canisters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 September 2012

Nuria Marcos Perea*
Affiliation:
Helsinki University of Technology, Engineering Geology & Geophysics Lab, FIN-02150 Espoo, FINLAND
Get access

Abstract

The Hyrkkölä U-Cu mineralization is located in south-western Finland, nearthe Palmottu analog site, in crystalline, metamorphic bedrock. The age ofthe mineralization is estimated to be between 1.8 and 1.7 Ga. The existenceof native copper and copper sulfides in open fractures in the near-surfacezone allows us to study the native copper corrosion process in conditionsanalogous to a nuclear fuel waste repository.

From the study of mineral assemblages or paragenesis, it appears that theformation of copper sulfide (djurleite, Cu1.934S) after nativecopper (Cu°) under anoxic (reducing) conditions is enhanced by theavailability of dissolved hydrogen sulfide (HS) in the groundwatercirculating in open fractures in the near-surface zone. The minimumconcentration of HS in the groundwater is estimated to be of the order of 10-5 M (∼ 10-4 g/1) and the minimum pH value notlower than about 7.8 as indicated by the presence of calcite crystals in thesame fracture.

The present study is the first one performed on occurrences of native copperin reducing, neutral to slightly alkaline groundwaters. Thus, the dataobtained is of most relevance in improving models of anoxic corrosion ofcopper canisters.

Information

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

1. Korzhinskii, D.S., Physicochemical Basis of the Analysis of the Paragenesis of Minerals, New York: Consultants Bureau (1959).Google Scholar
2. Potter, R.W., Econ. Geol. 72, p. 1524 – 1542, (1977).10.2113/gsecongeo.72.8.1524Google Scholar
3. Snellgrove, R.A. and Barnes, L.H., in Trans. Am. Geophys. Union, v. 55., p. 484, (1974).Google Scholar
4. Mason, B., Principles of Geochemistry, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, (1966).Google Scholar
5. Ahonen, L., Report YJT-95–19, (1995), (Helsinki, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies).10.1016/B978-081551381-0.50004-XGoogle Scholar
6. Pitkänen, P., Snellman, M., and Leino-Forsman, H., Report YJT-92–30, (1992), (Helsinki, Nuclear Waste Commission of Finnish Power Companies).Google Scholar
7. Blomqvist, R., Pilviö, R., Ahonen, L., and Ruskeeniemi, T., Geol. Surv. Finland, Rep. YST-78 (1992), p. 3267.Google Scholar