Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-tj2md Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T10:59:49.780Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvement of Wafer Edge Profile and Cmp Performance Through The Floating Head Design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

Huey-Ming Wang
Affiliation:
Cybeq Nano Technologies, 45 E. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134
Mario Stella
Affiliation:
Cybeq Nano Technologies, 45 E. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134
Sesinando Deguzman
Affiliation:
Cybeq Nano Technologies, 45 E. Plumeria Drive, San Jose, CA 95134
Get access

Abstract

The dependence of IC fabrication on the Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) process increases as the device features go down to 0.25 micron or beyond. Due to the tighter CMP process spec, it is very important to reduce the within wafer non-uniformity (WIWNU%) to achieve higher process yield. The symmetrical increment of linear velocity at wafer edge is not sufficient to change wafer edge profile by breaking the matched speed rule. A better solution is through the change of head design for a fixed platen from the polisher design point of view. This study demonstrates the improvement of the CMP process performance, especially at the wafer edge, from the modification of the floating type polish head. The best WIWNU% from a single air chamber head is about 5.12% at 6-mm edge exclusion (EE). In order to obtain better pad deformation control, the retaining-ring pressure chamber is separated from that of the sub-carrier. The average WIWNU% is about 4% for 3-mm and 5-mm EE from two-pressure-chamber head. Due to the limitation of retaining-ring pressure effect, a third pressure chamber is further added that can be extended the edge control up to 1 inch from the wafer edge. The WIWNU% is about 3.8% at 5-mm edge exclusion with low down forces. The slurry and insert types also show effect on the wafer edge profile. It has been also proven that this three-pressure-chamber head is able to reduce the post-CMP thickness variation from the ILD production wafer, especially at wafer edges. More detailed information and CMP mechanism will be discussed in this paper.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCE

(1) Steigerwald, J. M., Murarka, S. P., and Gutmann, R. J.; Chemical Mechanical Planarization of Microelectronic Materials, p22, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1997 10.1002/9783527617746Google Scholar
(2) Preston, F. W., J. Soc. Glass Technol, 11, p247 (1927)Google Scholar
(3) Cook, L. M., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 120, p152 (1990)10.1016/0022-3093(90)90200-6Google Scholar
(4) Zhang, F. and Busnaina, A.; Electrochem. and Solid-State Letters, 1(4), p184 (1998)10.1149/1.1390679Google Scholar
(5) Tseng, W.T., Wang, Y. L., J. Electrochem. Soc., 144 (2), L14 (1997)Google Scholar
(6) Cook, L. M., Wang, J. F., James, D. B., and Sethuraman, A. R., Semicond. Int., 11, 141 (1995)Google Scholar
(7) Baker, A. R., Proceedings of Electrochem. Soc. Meetings, 96 (22), p228 (1996)Google Scholar