Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T07:54:48.643Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

In Situ Curvature and Diffraction Studies of Pd Films on Si(001) During Solid-State Reaction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

P. Gergaud
Affiliation:
TECSEN, CNRS, FST St Jérôme, Univ Aix-Marseille III, 13397 Marseille, FRANCE
O. Thomas
Affiliation:
TECSEN, CNRS, FST St Jérôme, Univ Aix-Marseille III, 13397 Marseille, FRANCE
B. Chenevier
Affiliation:
LMGP, CNRS, ENSPG, BP 46, 38402 Saint Martin d'Hères, FRANCE
V. Ghetta
Affiliation:
LTPCM, CNRS, INPG/UJF, BP 75, 38402 Saint Martin d’Hères, FRANCE
A. Mouroux
Affiliation:
KTH, Department of Electronics, P.O. Box E229, 164 40 Kista, SWEDEN
S.L. Zhang
Affiliation:
KTH, Department of Electronics, P.O. Box E229, 164 40 Kista, SWEDEN
Get access

Abstract

The stress evolution during silicide formation from thin metal films on Si substrates is not well understood. It requires a detailed knowledge of the mechanical properties of each substance, i.e. metal, silicide(s) and Si, in the reacting system. In situ curvature measurement generally gives access to the overall force in the layered stack, whereas in situ X-ray diffraction (XRD) provides information about the mechanical strain in each crystalline sublayer. In this study, we performed both in situ XRD and curvature measurements on the Pd/Si(001) system. From both measurements, we found out that the in-plane strain in the metal and in the silicide is compressive. Whereas it decreases all along the solid-state reaction for the silicide, it slightly increases for the metal. We then compared our results with the qualitative model proposed by Zhang and d'Heurle. This model suggests a high compressive stress in the silicide at the very first stage of the reaction. This is in good agreement with our experimental results. Finally, the measured strains were then translated into force per unit width and compared to in-situ curvature measurement results. A good qualitative agreement between these two different measurements was also found.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Stoney, G.G., Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. A 82 (1909) 172.10.1098/rspa.1909.0021Google Scholar
2. d'Heurle, F.M., Thomas, O., Defect and diffusion forum, 129–130 (1996) 137.10.4028/www.scientific.net/DDF.129-130.137Google Scholar
3. Zhang, S.L. and d'Heurle, F.M., Thin Solid Films 213 (1992) 34.10.1016/0040-6090(92)90471-MGoogle Scholar
4. Massalski, T.B. in Binary alloys phase diagrams, 1 3045.Google Scholar
5. Noyan, I. and Cohen, J., Residual stresses, Springer Verlag, Stuttgart (1987).10.1007/978-1-4613-9570-6Google Scholar
6. Flinn, P.A., Gardner, D.S. and Nix, W.D., IEEE Trans. Elec. Dev. Ed–34, 689 (1987).10.1109/T-ED.1987.22981Google Scholar
7. Buaud, P.P., d'Heurle, F.M., Chevacharoenkul, S. and Irene, E.A., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 11 (2) (1993) 304.10.1116/1.586675Google Scholar
8. Rayne, J.A., Physical review, 118 (1960) 1545.10.1103/PhysRev.118.1545Google Scholar
9. Little, T.W. and Chen, H., J. Appl. Phys. 63 4 (1988) 1182.10.1063/1.339977Google Scholar
10. d'Heurle, F.M., Gas, P. and Philibert, J., Solid state phenomena (1995).Google Scholar