Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T07:30:24.021Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

InGaAs/GaAs Quantum Well Structures Grown by Migration-Enhanced Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

J.E. Wu
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WA 98195
H.M. Yoo
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WA 98195
T.G. Stoebe
Affiliation:
Dept. of Materials Science and EngineeringUniversity of WashingtonSeattle, WA 98195
Get access

Abstract

GaAs/In.2Ga.8As/GaAs quantum well structures containing InGaAs layers of thickness over and under the critical thickness (hc) were studied, as grown by both conventional molecular beam epitaxy (C-MBE) and migration-enhanced epitaxy (MEE) techniques. A 6.0 monolayer per cycle (ML/cyc) growth rate, in contrast to a one or less-than-one ML/cyc growth rate used in a conventional MEE process, was used to grow In.2Ga.8As layers over hc. As-grown samples were characterized via photoluminescence, X-ray diffraction, and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The 6.0 ML/cyc MEE-grown layers over hc show superior optical quality to MBE-grown layers with the same thickness. Both X-ray diffraction and TEM microstructure results indicate that the 6.0 ML/cyc MEE-grown In.2Ga.8As layers are still strained layers while those grown by conventional MBE method are not. The 6.0 ML/cyc MEE process seems to be advantageous for growing InGaAs layers over the critical thickness.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Osbourn, G.C., Phys. Rev. B127, 5126 (1983)Google Scholar
2. Matthews, J.W. and Blakeslee, A.E., J. of Crystal Growth, 22, 118 (1974)Google Scholar
3. People, R. and Bean, J.C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 47, 32 (1985)Google Scholar
4. Horikoshi, Y., Kawashima, M., and Yamaguchi, H., Jpn. J. Appl, Phys. 25(10), L868(1986)Google Scholar
5. Zou, J., Usher, B. F., Cockayne, D. J. H. and Glaisher, R.. J. of Electronic Matls. 20, 885 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Anderson, T. G., Chen, Z. G., Kulakovaskii, V. D., Uddin, A. and Vallin, J. T., Appl. Phys. Lett. 51, 752 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Orders, P.J. and Usher, B.F., Appl.Phys.Lett. 50, 980 (1987)Google Scholar
8. Bravman, J.C. and Sinclair, R., J. Electron Microscopy Technique, 1, 53 (1984).Google Scholar