Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-45l2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T13:01:15.637Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interfacial Stability of CoSi2/Si Structures Grown by Molecular Beam Epitaxy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

T. George
Affiliation:
Center for Space Microelectronics Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
R. W. Fathauer
Affiliation:
Center for Space Microelectronics Technology, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91109.
Get access

Abstract

The stability of CoSi2/Si interfaces was examined in this study using columnar suicide structures grown on (111) Si substrates. In the first set of experiments, Co and Si were co-deposited (1:7 flux ratio) using molecular beam epitaxy at 800°C and the resulting columnar suicide layer was capped by epitaxial Si. Deposition of Co on the surface of the Si capping layer at 800°C results in the growth of the buried suicide columns. The buried columns grow by subsurface diffusion of the deposited Co, suppressing the formation of surface islands of CoSi2. The columns' sidewalls appear to be less stable than the top and bottom interfaces, resulting in preferential lateral growth and ultimately in the coalescence of the columns to form a continuous buried CoSi2 layer.

In the second set of experiments, annealing of a 250nm-thick buried columnar layer at 1000°C under a 100nm-thick Si capping layer results in the formation of a surface layer of CoSi2 with a reduction in the sizes of the CoSi2 columns. For a sample having a thicker (500nm) Si capping layer the annealing leads to Ostwald ripening producing buried equiaxed columns. The' high CoSi2/Si interfacial strain could provide the driving force for the observed behavior of the buried columns under high-temperature annealing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Tung, R. T., Gibson, J. M., Bean, J. C., Poate, J. M. and Jacobson, D. C., Appl. Phys. Lett. 40, 684 (1982).Google Scholar
2. Fathauer, R. W., Nieh, C. W., Xiao, Q. F. and Hashimoto, S., Thin Solid Films 184, 335 (1990).Google Scholar
3. George, T. and Fathauer, R. W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 59, 3247 (1991)Google Scholar
4. White, A. E., Short, K. T., Dynes, R. C., Arno, J. P. and Gibson, J. M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 50, 95 (1987).Google Scholar
5. Bulle-Lieuwma, C. W. T., Van Oomen, A. H., Vandenhoudt, D. E. W., Ottenheim, J. J. M. and de Jong reference, A. F., J. Appl. Phys. 70, 3093 (1991).Google Scholar