Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-dnltx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T23:12:10.377Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interlayer Diffusion in Langmuir-Blodgett Multilayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Mark D. Foster
Affiliation:
Department of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-3909
Timothy R. Vierheller
Affiliation:
Department of Polymer Science, The University of Akron, Akron, Ohio 44325-3909
Albert Schmidt
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, D-6500 Mainz 1, Germany
Klemens Mathauer
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, D-6500 Mainz 1, Germany
Wolfgang Knoll
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, D-6500 Mainz 1, Germany
Gerhard Wegner
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, D-6500 Mainz 1, Germany
Sushil Satija
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Polymerforschung, D-6500 Mainz 1, Germany
Charles Majkrzak
Affiliation:
National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD 20899.
Get access

Abstract

Interlayer diffusion in Langmuir-Blodgett multilayers containing Cadmium Arachidate (CdA), polyglutamate (PG) copolymers, or both, was investigated using neutron and x-ray reflectometry. Measurements from multilayers comprised only of CdA or PG revealed that little interdiffusion occurred upon annealing at 70°C or 84°C. However, some relaxation of the intralayer microstructure in the PG samples was observed at both temperatures. In contrast, the neutron reflectivity of a multilayer sandwich containing a bilayer of PG between two multilayers of CdA showed gradual and progressive change with annealing at both temperatures for annealing times of up to several hours. This change is surprising as PG is expected to act as a barrier to interdiffusion of the CdA molecules at these temperatures.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Swalen, J.D., Allara, D.K., Andrade, J.D., Chandross, E.A., Garoff, S., Israelachvili, J., McCarthy, T.J., Murray, R., Pease, R.F., Rabolt, J.F., Wynne, K., and Yu, H., Langmuir, 3, 932, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2. Roberts, G.G., Adv. in Phys., 34, 475, 1985.Google Scholar
3. Rabolt, J.F., Stroeve, P., Chen, S.H., Heleki, R., and Felcher, G.P., IPNS Progress Report 1988-1990. Experimental Reports, p.121, 1990.Google Scholar
4. Stroeve, P., Rabolt, J.F., Felcher, G.P., and Chen, S.H., IPNS Progress Report 1988-1990. Experimental Reports, p.126, 1990.Google Scholar
5. Musgrove, R.J., Grundy, M.J., Roser, S.J., and Richardson, R.M., ISIS Annual Report 1990. p.A113.Google Scholar
6. Fujihira, M.K., Nishiyama, M.K., and Hamaguchi, Y., J.Chem.Soc., Chem. Commun., 11, 823, 1986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Sasanuma, Y., Kitano, Y., Ishitani, A., Nakahara, H., and Fukuda, K, Thin Solid Films, 199, 359, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Rabe, J. P., Swalen, J. D., and Rabolt, J. F., J. Chem. Phys. 86, 1601, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Stroeve, P., private communication.Google Scholar
10. Mathauer, K. and Frank, C., unpublished results.Google Scholar